Peircean Abduction: Instinct or Inference?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Hegel and Peircean Abduction
‘Abduction’ was the term Charles Sanders Peirce used in his later writings for a type of inference that he had earlier called ‘hypothesis’ and that is now commonly called ‘inference to the best explanation’. According to Peirce, abduction constituted, alongside induction, a distinct second form of nondemonstrative or probabilistic inference. Especially in his later work, Peirce conceived of abd...
متن کاملMusicality: Instinct or Acquired Skill?
Is the human tendency toward musicality better thought of as the product of a specific, evolved instinct or an acquired skill? Developmental and evolutionary arguments are considered, along with issues of domain-specificity. The article also considers the question of why humans might be consistently and intensely drawn to music if musicality is not in fact the product of a specifically evolved ...
متن کاملProduction Inference, Nonmonotonicity and Abduction
We introduce a general formalism of production inference relations that posses both a standard monotonic semantics and a natural nonmonotonic semantics. The resulting nonmonotonic system is shown to provide a syntax-independent representation of abductive reasoning. Abduction is a reasoning from facts to their possible explanations that is widely used now in many areas of AI, including diagnosi...
متن کاملDoes Learning or Instinct Shape Habitat Selection?
Habitat selection is an important behavioural process widely studied for its population-level effects. Models of habitat selection are, however, often fit without a mechanistic consideration. Here, we investigated whether patterns in habitat selection result from instinct or learning for a population of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Alberta, Canada. We found that habitat selection and related...
متن کاملResource-sensitive synchronisation inference by abduction
We present an analysis which takes as its input a sequential program, augmented with annotations indicating potential parallelization opportunities, and a sequential proof, written in separation logic, and produces a correctly-synchronized parallelized program and proof of that program. Unlike previous work, ours is not an independence analysis; we insert synchronization constructs to preserve ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Semiotica
سال: 2005
ISSN: 0037-1998,1613-3692
DOI: 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.131