Risk Aversion, Managerial Reputation, and Debt–Equity Conflict
نویسندگان
چکیده
When a firm finances new project by issuing debt, it has an incentive to invest in excessively high-risk projects because shareholders enjoy all the benefits case is successful but have limited liability when fails. Anticipating such behavior, creditors may require higher interest rate or even refuse provide capital. This debt–equity conflict alleviated fact that most investment decisions are made risk-averse managers who not as well diversified shareholders. paper investigates firms which unobservable degree of risk averseness. Since managerial averseness desirable quality, asymmetric information makes undertake actions increase market’s perception them being highly risk-averse. Consequently, reputation building leads lower number undertaken. compares entrepreneurial economy, sole owners firms, with corporate hired Using overlapping generations model, this shows can partially resolve and improve efficiency both economies; however, improvement larger economy.
منابع مشابه
Managerial reputation and the ‘endgame’
This paper examines endgame behavior, specifically the behavior of managers whose primary concern is to retain their jobs. Managers are taken to be of two types, good and bad, and only one manager is randomly selected as the firm’s first-period manager. The manager unobservably chooses the mean and standard deviation (limited by a mean-standard deviation frontier) of the process that generates ...
متن کاملReputation and Conflict
We study reputation in conflict games. The players can use their first round actions to signal their types. With strategic substitutes, a reputation for being hostile is desirable, because it causes the opponent to be more dovish in period two. Dovish behavior in round one is a sign of weakness, which makes the opponent more hawkish. With strategic substitutes, neither player wants to be seen a...
متن کاملGoing Public without Governance: Managerial Reputation Effects
This paper addresses the agency problem between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders. This problem is common among public firms in many countries where the legal system does not effectively protect minority shareholders against oppression by controlling shareholders. We show that even without any explicit corporate governance mechanisms protecting minority shareholders, controllin...
متن کاملInequality aversion and risk aversion
This note shows that for two inequality averse social welfare functions, if one is more inequality averse than the other, the household preference induced by optimally allocating aggregate bundles according to this social welfare function is more risk averse than the other. We present examples showing that this comparative static can be reversed if inequality aversion is dropped. We show that t...
متن کاملBut Is It Myopia? Risk Aversion and the Efficiency of Stock-Based Managerial Incentives
In the managerial myopia literature the firm always faces some agency problem or other market imperfection. It is unclear whether the myopic behavior found in these models is due to stock-based incentives or the model's other market imperfections. This paper points out that stock incentives do not lead to myopia unless they result in more emphasis on the short-term than would occur under an opt...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Games
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2073-4336']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/g13020025