Standards needed for gene-editing errors
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Errors in Boiler Efficiency Standards
This paper presents both criticism and suggested changes to boiler efficiency standards associated with fossil-fired steam generators. These standards include the widely used ASME PTC 4.1 and DIN 1942, and their replacements ASME PTC 4:2008 and the European EN 12952-15. For these standards it is useful to review both old and new. The chief criticism lies with inconsistent application of thermod...
متن کاملCommentary: Reporting standards are needed for evaluations of risk reclassification.
New approaches have been developed in recent years to quantify the improvement in prediction performance gained by adding a novel marker to a set of baseline predictors of risk. The paper by Tzoulaki et al. concerns risk reclassification techniques and focuses specifically on the net reclassification improvement (NRI) index. Their review shows that use of risk reclassification analysis is extre...
متن کاملGene Editing Versus Morphants
Kok et al. conclude that results with Morpholino oligos, which are not recapitulated by natural mutations or gene editing mutations, must be due to off-target effects and, when morphants and mutants differ, they contend that antisense oligo studies should be disregarded. Morpholinos and gene editing mutagenesis are very different technologies and, even if both work perfectly, may yield differen...
متن کاملOligonucleotide‐directed mutagenesis for precision gene editing
Differences in gene sequences, many of which are single nucleotide polymorphisms, underlie some of the most important traits in plants. With humanity facing significant challenges to increase global agricultural productivity, there is an urgent need to accelerate the development of these traits in plants. oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis (ODM), one of the many tools of Cibus' Rapid Trait De...
متن کاملEthics and germline gene editing.
T he current kerfuffle around the use of CRISPR/Cas9 and other gene editing technologies in human germline research is the latest in a series of related controversies at the intersection of science, medicine, and ethics [1]. Soon after a prominent ad hoc group of scientists called for a moratorium on clinical applications of germline gene editing [2], a research group from China published an ar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/523158a