Surgery for Perianal Fistula while Conserving Anal Function
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Predictors of outcome for anal fistula surgery.
OBJECTIVES To review our experience with patients treated for anal fistula secondary to cryptoglandular disease and to determine factors that influence postoperative outcome. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING A regional tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Adult patients with anal fistula secondary to cryptoglandular disease. INTERVENTIONS Fistulotomy, advancement flap, and fistula plu...
متن کاملVideo Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in a Child with Perianal Fistula.
Perianal fistula formation is a rare complication in children after rectal biopsy. Perianal fistula may become difficult to treat; therefore a lot of surgical options are present. One of these options is video assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT). We present a 6-year-old female who developed perianal fistula following rectal biopsy for which VAAFT was done successfully.
متن کاملPlugs for Anal Fistula Repair
Description of Procedure or Service Populations Interventions Comparators Outcomes Individuals: With anal fistula(s) Interventions of interest are: Placement of anal fistula plug Comparators of interest are: Fistulotomy/fistulectomy Endorectal/anal sliding flaps Seton drains Fibrin glue Relevant outcomes include: Symptoms Change in disease status Morbid events Functional out...
متن کاملmri for assessment of anal fistula
conclusions based on the results of this study and according to the 1117 sensitivity of mri, it’s useful to locate the perianal fistulas, reduce the chance of recurrence and postoperative complications and can contribute the healing process better than other diagnostic methods. results amongst the total of 14 patients,in 1 patient (7117) transsphincteric fistula, 11 patients (78167) intersphinc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0047-1801,1882-9619
DOI: 10.3862/jcoloproctology.69.529