The abstract theorem of Cauchy-Weil

Weil Converse Theorem

Hecke generalized this equivalence, showing that an integral form has an associated Dirichlet series which can be analytically continued to C and satisfies a functional equation. Conversely, Weil showed that, if a Dirichlet series satisfies certain functional equations, then it must be associated to some integral form. Our goal in this paper is to describe this work. In the first three sections...

Inhomogeneous Two-Parameter Abstract Cauchy Problem

the impact of using inspirational quotes on abstract vocabulary recall

the present study is an attempt to investigate the potential impact of inspirational quotes on improving english abstract vocabulary recall. to achieve this goal, a multiple choice language proficiency test of 60 items including vocabulary and grammar component was administered to a sample of 63 second-semester male and female students whose age ranged between 17 to 22 and they were studying en...

Weil Conjectures (Deligne’s Purity Theorem)

Let κ = Fq be a finite field of characteristic p > 0, and k be a fixed algebraic closure of κ. We fix a prime ` 6= p, and an isomorphism τ : Q` → C. Whenever we want to denote something (e.g. scheme, sheaf, morphism, etc.) defined over κ, we will put a subscript 0 (e.g. X0 is a scheme over κ, F0 is a Weil sheaf defined over X0, etc.), and when the subscript is dropped, this means the correspond...

Cauchy Integral Theorem

where we use the notation dxI for (1.4) dxI = dxi1 ∧ dxi2 ∧ ... ∧ dxik for I = {i1, i2, ..., ik} with i1 < i2 < ... < ik. So ΩX is a free module over C ∞(X) generated by dxI . Obviously, Ω k X = 0 for k > n and ⊕ΩX is a graded ring (noncommutative without multiplicative identity) with multiplication defined by the wedge product (1.5) ∧ : (ω1, ω2)→ ω1 ∧ ω2. Note that (1.6) ω1 ∧ ω2 = (−1)12ω2 ∧ ω...