Understanding the Better Than Average Effect on Altruism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Understanding the better than average effect: motives (still) matter.
People evaluate themselves more positively than they evaluate most other people. Although this better than average (BTA) effect was originally thought to represent a motivated bias, several cognitively oriented theorists have questioned whether this is the case. In support of a motivational model, the author reports five studies showing that the BTA effect is stronger for important attributes t...
متن کاملDoes the Better - Than - Average Effect
We conduct a proper test of the claim that people are overcon dent, in the sense that they believe that they are better than others. The results of the experiment we present do not allow us to reject the hypotheses that the data has been generated by perfectly rational, unbiased, and appropriately con dent agents. Keywords: Overcon dence; Better than Average; Experimental Economics; Irrationali...
متن کاملWhen Good = Better Than Average
People report themselves to be above average on simple tasks and below average on difficult tasks. This paper builds on prior research demonstrating this effect and proposes a simpler explanation for it: that people easily conflate relative with absolute evaluation, especially on ambiguous measures of evaluation. The paper then presents a series of four studies that examine this conflation expl...
متن کاملThe Better-Than-Average Effect Is Observed Because “Average” Is Often Construed as Below-Median Ability
Most people rate their abilities as better than "average" even though it is statistically impossible for most people to have better-than-median abilities. Some investigators explained this phenomenon in terms of a self-enhancement bias. The present study complements this motivational explanation with the parsimonious cognitive explanation that the phrase "average ability" may be interpreted as ...
متن کاملReversed better-than-average effect in direct comparisons of nonsocial stimuli depends on the set size
Studies on direct comparative judgments typically show that, for items that are positively evaluated, a single item randomly drawn from a larger set of similar items tends to be judged as better than average (the BTA effect). However, Windschitl, Conybeare, and Krizan (2008) demonstrated that, under timing conditions that do not favor focusing attention on the single item, the reversal of the B...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in Psychology
سال: 2021
ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562846