Undoing mastery: With ambivalence?

In this commentary, we respond to Derek Ruez and Daniel Cockayne’s article ‘Feeling Otherwise: Ambivalent Affects the Politics of Critique in Geography’. We do so by picking up ambivalence—or more precisely, ambivalence about ambivalence—as a tool with which Cockayne leave us. find somewhat difficult grasp, but understand as part its design. Ambivalence undoes subject’s mastery. doing so, that an airing gives other kinds entangled, indeterminate, unknowing relations room breathe.