Whoops, I did it again: Commission errors in prospective memory.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Whoops, I did it again: commission errors in prospective memory.
Prospective memory research almost exclusively examines remembering to execute an intention, but the ability to forget completed intentions may be similarly important. We had younger and older adults perform a prospective memory task (press Q when you see corn or dancer) and then told them that the intention was completed. Participants later performed a lexical-decision task (Phase 2) in which ...
متن کاملReplication Licensing: Oops! … I Did It Again
All eukaryotes use multiple controls to restrict DNA replication to once per cell cycle. Nevertheless, inactivation of a single gene, cul-4, causes massive re-replication in Caenorhabditis elegans. A novel study explains this dramatic phenotype by demonstrating that the CUL-4 E3 ligase simultaneously controls two critical licensing factors: CDT-1 and CDC-6.
متن کاملOops!.. I did it again: an ERP and behavioral study of double-errors.
To understand the sequealae of action monitoring failures, most previous studies have focused on neural (e.g., the ERN and Pe) and behavioral (e.g., post-error slowing) measures associated with correct trials that precede and follow errors. However, trials that precede and follow errors are not always correct, and no study to date has examined RT and ERP indices in double-error sequences that c...
متن کامل"Oops, I did it again." The impact of frequent behaviour on causal judgement
Current causal theories aim to incorporate the effect of statistical and prescriptive norms on causal judgements, stating that norm-violating actions are judged as more causal than norm-conforming ones. In this paper, we present two experiments that undermine this claim, showing that people attribute increased causality to agents who conform to the norm of frequent behaviour. Furthermore, we fi...
متن کامل"Oops, I Did It Again" - Security of One-Time Signatures Under Two-Message Attacks
One-time signatures (OTS) are called one-time, because the accompanying reductions only guarantee security under single-message attacks. However, this does not imply that efficient attacks are possible under two-message attacks. Especially in the context of hash-based OTS (which are basic building blocks of recent standardization proposals) this leads to the question if accidental reuse of a on...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychology and Aging
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1939-1498,0882-7974
DOI: 10.1037/a0026112