Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning
AIM This paper aims to explore patient and public representation in a NHS clinical commissioning group and how this is experienced by staff and lay members involved. BACKGROUND Patient and public involvement is believed to foster greater public representativeness in the development and delivery of health care services. However, there is widespread debate about what representation is or what i...
متن کاملWhose health, whose care, whose say? Some comments on public involvement in new NHS commissioning arrangements
Recent health policy in England has demanded greater involvement of patients and the public in the commissioning of health and social care services. Public involvement is seen as a means of driving up service quality, reducing health inequalities and achieving value in commissioning decisions. This paper presents a summary and analysis of the forms that public involvement in commissioning are t...
متن کاملWhose Voices are Heard in Patient Safety Incident Reports?
Patient safety incident reporting systems are used to monitor adverse events, generate information for risk management and to improve patient safety. A number of electronic reporting systems have been developed, but their data elements appear relatively similar. An inductive data analysis was carried out to find out especially what is the content of descriptions of contributing factors of adver...
متن کاملPatient and public involvement.
The involvement of patients and the public in the development of clinical research initiatives in the UK has been central and is increasing. Whilst initially developed in relation to cancer research and cancer care, this activity has now generalized to all of healthcare research particularly through organizations such as INVOLVE (www.invo.org.uk). Patients and Public Involvement (PPI) has been ...
متن کاملGeneral practice commissioning: in whose interests?
Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England have awarded hundreds of contracts worth at least £2.4bn (€3.4bn; $3.7bn) to organisations in which their board members have a financial interest, a joint investigation by The BMJ and The Times has found. This new analysis shows the extent to which CCG boards have become conflicted under the health reforms introduced in 2012, which handed general ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Health Expectations
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1369-6513
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12475