Preferential Action Semantics (preliminary Report) Preferential Action Semantics (preliminary Report)
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper we propose a new way of considering reasoning about action and change Rather than placing a preferential structure onto the models of logical theories we place such a structure directly on the semantics of the actions involved In this way we obtain a preferential semantics of actions by means of which we can not only deal with several of the traditional problems in this area such as the frame and rami cation problems but can generalize these solutions to a context which includes both nondeterministic and concurrent actions In fact the net result is an integration of semantical and veri cational techniques from the paradigm of imperative and concurrent programs in particular as known from traditional programming with the AI perspective In this paper the main focus is on semantical i e model theoretical issues rather than providing a logical calculus which would be the next step in the endeavor Preferential Action Semantics Preliminary Report John Jules Ch Meyer Intelligent Systems Group Dept of Computer Science Utrecht University P O Box TB Utrecht The Netherlands jj cs ruu nl Patrick Doherty University of Link oping Dept of Computer Science S Link oping Sweden patdo ida liu se
منابع مشابه
Preferential Semantics for Action Speci cations in First - orderModal Action
In this paper we investigate preferential semantics for declarative speciications in a First Order Modal Action Logic. We address some well known problems: the frame problem, the qualiication problem and the ramiication problem. We incorporate the assumptions that are inherent to both the frame and qualiication problem into the semantics of the modal Action Logic by deening orderings over Dynam...
متن کاملPreferential Semantics for Causal Fixpoints
In this paper we concentrate on the causal theory of action developed by McCain and Turner 2] for computing ramiications. Our aim here is to characterise this theory of action in terms of a preferential-style semantics in the spirit of Shoham 4]. Such a result would not only place McCain and Turner's theory in a uniform setting, facilitating comparison with other logics of action, but also give...
متن کاملInaccessible Worlds and Irrelevance: Preliminary Report
Recently, the relationship between several forms of default reasoning based on conditional defaults has been investigated. In particular, the systems based on ε-semantics, preferential models, and (fragments of) modally-defined conditional logics have been shown to be equivalent. These systems form a plausible core for default inference, but are too weak in general, failing to deal adequately w...
متن کاملA Unifying Semantics for Causal Ramifications
A unifying semantic framework for different reasoning approaches provides an ideal tool to compare these competing alternatives. However, it has been shown recently that a pure preferential semantics alone is not capable of providing such a unifying framework. On the other hand, variants of preferential semantics augmented by additional structures on the state space have been successfully used ...
متن کاملPreferential Semantics for Causal Systems
In the present work we examine the causal theory of actions put forward by McCain and Turner [McCain and Turner, 1995] for determining ramifications. Our principal aim is to provide a characterisation of this causal theory of actions in terms of a Shoham-like preferential semantics [Shoham, 1988]. This would have a twofold advantage: it would place McCain and Turner’s theory in perspective, all...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996