Evolutionary bargaining with intentional idiosyncratic play☆

نویسندگان

  • Suresh Naidu
  • Sung-Ha Hwang
  • Samuel Bowles
چکیده

We study equilibrium selection in stochastic evolutionary bargaining games in which idiosyncratic play is intentional instead of random. In contract games, the stochastically stable state selected by intentional idiosyncratic play is the Nash bargain, rather than the usual Kalai-Smorodinsky solution.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Equilibrium Selection by Intentional Idiosyncratic Play

We introduce intentional idiosyncratic play in a standard stochastic evolutionary model of equilibrium selection in bargaining games. We define intentional mutations as rare play of mixed strategies that are supported only on the set of strategies that would give the idiosyncratic player a higher payoff were sufficiently many others to do the same. In contract games intentional idiosyncratic pl...

متن کامل

Applying Fogel and Burgin’s ‘Competitive Goal-Seeking through Evolutionary Programming’ to Coordination, Trust, and Bargaining Games

Experiments are conducted in which a population of finite state machines learn to play three different games termed coordination, trust, and bargaining. These games were offered in the early literature of evolutionary computation and can serve as possible benchmarks for study. In particular, attention is focused on the emergent behavior that arises when a population of finite state machines sta...

متن کامل

Comparing Equilibria for Game-Theoretic and Evolutionary Bargaining Models

Game-theoretic models of bargaining are typically based on the assumption that players have perfect rationality and that they always play an equilibrium strategy. In contrast, research in experimental economics shows that in bargaining between human subjects, participants do not always play the equilibrium strategy. Such agents are said to be boundedly rational. In playing a game against a boun...

متن کامل

Why Sunk Costs Matter for Bargaining Outcomes: An Evolutionary Approach

Two bargaining parties play the Nash Demand Game to share a pie whose size is determined by one party's investment decision. Various investment levels are subgame-perfect. Adding the investment decision to Young's evolutionary bargaining model yields the following long-run outcome: efficient investment prevails and the investor's share of the pie approximates die maximum of (i) the smallest sha...

متن کامل

Constraint-based Co-evolutionary Genetic Programming for Bargaining Problems

This thesis applies evolutionary algorithms to tackle bargaining games. Evolutionary algorithms can discover efficient and stationary strategies for various bargaining games. Game-theoretic method requires a substantial amount of mathematical reasoning. Thus this method restricts to simple problems. Moreover, game-theoretic solutions rest on the crucial assumption that every player is perfectly...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009