A general class of simple majority decision rules based on linguistic opinions
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper we have introduced a class of decision rules related to simple majority, by considering individual intensities of preference. These intensities will be shown by means of linguistic labels. In order to compare the amount of opinion obtained by each alternative, we have considered the total ordered monoid generated by the sums of the original labels, according to an addition and an ordering. In this general framework different sets of linguistic labels can be employed and these sets can be represented by means of diverse mathematical objects. Moreover, on these mathematical representations of linguistic labels several orderings can be considered. Thus, flexibility is an important feature of this new class of group decision making procedures. Some examples of putting in practice the simple majority decision rules based on linguistic labels are provided, and the main properties of these voting systems are analyzed. It is worth emphasizing that these properties are satisfied for any total ordered monoid, regardless of the mathematical representation of linguistic labels or the ordering used to compare collective opinions.
منابع مشابه
Essays in Information Elicitation and Market Design by Blake
This dissertation consists of three essays in microeconomic theory. The first two focus on how to elicit information about the state of the world from strategic agents, either to make a decision or for its own sake. The third studies a model of decentralized two-sided matching markets. In “Mechanisms for making accurate decisions in biased crowds”, I study decision rules for finding the true an...
متن کاملMechanisms for Making Accurate Decisions in Biased Crowds
This paper studies procedures for identifying the true answer to a binary question using the opinions of potentially-biased individuals. It’s common and natural to side with the majority opinion, but the majority may make the wrong choice when the agents are biased. Taking majority rule as a baseline, I study peer-prediction decision rules, which ask agents to predict the opinions of others in ...
متن کاملExtended TOPSIS for Group Decision Making with Linguistic Quantifiers and Concept of Majority Opinion
This paper presents a fuzzy extension of TOPSIS (technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution) with a new quantifier guided distance metric and majority opinion aggregator for multi-criteria decision making in a group decision environment. The proposed distance metric is based on OWA aggregators and provides an opportunity to use linguistic quantifiers to have linguistic defi...
متن کاملOn Mining Fuzzy Classification Rules for Imbalanced Data
Fuzzy rule-based classification system (FRBCS) is a popular machine learning technique for classification purposes. One of the major issues when applying it on imbalanced data sets is its biased to the majority class, such that, it performs poorly in respect to the minority class. However many cases the minority classes are more important than the majority ones. In this paper, we have extended ...
متن کاملOn Mining Fuzzy Classification Rules for Imbalanced Data
Fuzzy rule-based classification system (FRBCS) is a popular machine learning technique for classification purposes. One of the major issues when applying it on imbalanced data sets is its biased to the majority class, such that, it performs poorly in respect to the minority class. However many cases the minority classes are more important than the majority ones. In this paper, we have extended ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Inf. Sci.
دوره 176 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006