Three Datatype Defining Rewrite Systems for Datatypes of Integers each extending a Datatype of Naturals
نویسندگان
چکیده
Integer arithmetic is specified according to three views: unary, binary, and decimal notation. The binary and decimal view have as their characteristic that each normal form resembles common number notation, that is, either a digit, or a string of digits without leading zero, or the negated versions of the latter. The unary view comprises a specification of integer arithmetic based on 0, successor function S, and predecessor function, with negative normal forms −S(0). Integer arithmetic in binary and decimal notation is based on (postfix) digit append functions. For each view we define a ground-confluent and terminating datatype defining rewrite system (DDRS), and in each case the resulting datatype is a canonical term algebra that extends a corresponding canonical term algebra for natural numbers. Then, for each view, we consider an alternative DDRS based on tree constructors that yield comparable normal forms, which for that binary and decimal view admits expressions that are algorithmically more involved. These DDRSes are incorporated because they are closer to existing literature. For these DDRSes we also provide ground-completeness results. Finally, we define a DDRS for the ring of Integers (comprising fifteen rewrite rules) and prove its ground-completeness.
منابع مشابه
OWL-E: Extending OWL with Expressive Datatype Expressions
Although OWL, an emerged standard of expressing ontologies in the Semantic Web, is a very expressive ontology language, the OWL datatyping formalism is far not expressive enough to generally represent user-defined datatypes (such as XML Schema derived datatypes), not to mention user-defined datatype predicates (such as > for non-negative integers) in Semantic Web ontologies and applications. In...
متن کاملExtending DL Reasoning Support for the OWL Datatyping (or "Why Datatype Groups?")
The OWL [2] datatype formalism (or simply OWL datatyping) presents some new requirements for DL reasoning services, in terms of semantics (to allow the use of so-called 'un-supported' datatypes), expressive power (to support enumerated datatypes) and datatype construction mechanism (both datatypes and datatype expressions). On the other hand, OWL datatyping is expected to be extended to include...
متن کاملA Transformation to Convert Packing Code to Compact Datatypes for Efficient Zero-Copy Data Transfer
Many high performance applications spend considerable timepacking data into contiguous communication buffers. Datatypesprovide an alternative by describing the layout of the communi-cated data. This empowers the runtime system to retrieve non-contiguous elements directly from application data structures.However, programmers find complex datatypes hard to use andare reluc...
متن کاملA Scheme for Integrating Datatype Groups into Description Logics
Existing ontology-related formalisms focus on either datatypes (such as the OWL datatype formalism) or datatype predicates (such as the concrete domain approach). Furthermore, they don’t provide a general framework for representing customised datatypes and predicates, which is identified as a key requirement of ontology languages. In this paper we shall propose a scheme for integrating concept ...
متن کاملTractable Extensions of the Description Logic EL with Numerical Datatypes
We consider extensions of the lightweight description logic (DL) EL with numerical datatypes such as naturals, integers, rationals and reals equipped with relations such as equality and inequalities. It is well-known that the main reasoning problems for such DLs are decidable in polynomial time provided that the datatypes enjoy the so-called convexity property. Unfortunately many combinations o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1406.3280 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014