Econometric Analyses of U.S. Abortion Policy: A Critical View

نویسنده

  • Jonathan Klick
چکیده

This article surveys, in non-technical language, various econometric studies on the correlation between changes in access to abortion (whether through legalization, increased public funding, increased safety, etc.) and social phenomena such as sexual activity, crime, and opportunities for women. It argues that many econometrics-based abortion studies are contentious, often yielding varying results depending on the stakes of those commissioning the studies, and often too technical to be useful to policy-makers. As a result of these shortcomings, the author calls for methodological soundness and publication for a more general audience for those social scientists who want to enter the reproductive rights debate.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Econometric analyses of U.S. abortion policy: a critical review.

Few social issues in the U.S. are as contentious as the legal status of induced abortion. Thirty years after the Supreme Court declared state laws restricting abortion unconstitutional in Roe v. Wade, 93 S.Ct. 705, poll results suggest that the U.S. population is almost evenly split over whether the next nominee to the Supreme Court should support or oppose legal abortion in most or all context...

متن کامل

Econometric Analysis of U.S. Abortion Policy: A Critical Review

Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Econometrics Commons, Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Health Law Commons, Health Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Studies Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, Women Commons, Women's Health Commons, and the Women'...

متن کامل

Framing Assumptions and Cyberspace Regulation: A Critical Reflection on Differences among Countries

Thispaper attempts to connect two rather different fields of study by applying concepts from regulating technological risks to the field of cyberspace regulation. The concept of framing assumption is used in order to show the cyberspace regulation differences in  countries particularly between the U.S. and the Euopean system. It shows how the U.S. and Europe have adopted different assumptions r...

متن کامل

Feminism and Abortion in the United States’ Party Politics

Abstract The feminist movement in the United States like other countries has tried to establish equality for women. From the first attempts to gain constitutional right for vote, up to the current radical demands, feminists have struggled to make changes in the U.S. party politics and obtain their rights within the parties. One of the important issues in which women played a key role in party ...

متن کامل

Culture Wars and Opinion Polarization: The Case of Abortion

Recent observers have pointed to a growing polarization within the U.S. public over politicized moral issues—the so-called culture wars. DiMaggio, Evans, and Bryson studied trends over the past 25 years in American opinion on a number of critical social issues, finding little evidence of increased polarization; abortion is the primary exception. However, their conclusions are suspect because th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013