Belief Updates in Multiple Agent Systems
نویسنده
چکیده
We give a model for a multi-agent system which describes how the knowledge and beliefs of agents should change when they receive new information. The formal tool we use for this description is a combination of modal and dynamic logic. Two core notions in our model of belief update are the expansion of the knowledge and beliefs of an agent, and the processing of new information by an agent. An expansion has been deened as the change in the knowledge and beliefs of an agent when it decides to believe an incoming formula while holding on to its current propositional beliefs. To prevent our agents from forming inconsistent beliefs they do not expand with every piece of information they receive. Instead of that, our agents remember their original beliefs (the beliefs they had before receiving any information) and every piece of information they receive. After every receipt of information they decide which (consistent) subset of the received information should be incorporated into their original beliefs. The decision which subset should be used is based on the trust the agents have in the sources of the received information. This procedure is called the processing of new information. We show that our model of belief update behaves in an intuitive way and that it is not sensitive to the critique on comparable models.
منابع مشابه
Partial observable update for subjective logic and its application for trust estimation
Subjective Logic (SL) is a type of probabilistic logic, which is suitable for reasoning about situations with uncertainty and incomplete knowledge. In recent years, SL has drawn a significant amount of attention from the multi-agent systems community as it connects beliefs and uncertainty in propositions to a rigorous statistical characterization via Dirichlet distributions. However, one seriou...
متن کاملIterated Belief Change: A Transition System Approach
We use a transition system approach to reason about the evolution of an agent’s beliefs as actions are executed. Some actions cause an agent to perform belief revision and some actions cause an agent to perform belief update, but the interaction between revision and update can be nonelementary. We present a set of basic postulates describing the interaction of revision and update, and we introd...
متن کاملMulti-Agent Belief Revision with Linked Plausibilities
In [11] it is shown how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic of belief revision that extends the logic of communication and change (LCC) given in [7]. This new version of epistemic/doxastic PDL does not impose any constraints on the basic relations and because of this it does not suffer from the drawback of LCC that these constraints may get lost under updates that ar...
متن کاملDynamic Belief Revision over Multi-Agent Plausibility Models
In this paper, we develop a notion of doxastic actions, general enough to cover all examples of communication actions and most other belief-changing actions encountered in the literature, but also flexible enough to deal with the issue of (static and dynamic) revision of beliefs. This can be seen as a natural extension of the work in [3, 4] on “epistemic actions”, incorporating ideas from the s...
متن کاملConditional Doxastic Models: A Qualitative Approach to Dynamic Belief Revision
In this paper, we present a semantical approach to multi-agent belief revision and belief update. For this, we introduce relational structures called conditional doxastic models (CDM’s, for short). We show this setting to be equivalent to an epistemic version of the classical AGM Belief Revision theory. We present a logic of conditional beliefs that is complete w.r.t. CDM’s. Moving then to beli...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999