A Unifying Framework for Synchronic and Diachronic Emergence

نویسنده

  • Vladimír Havlík
چکیده

The traditional discourse on emergent relationship, developed especially in the context of weak and strong emergence, significantly shifted in the direction of making a distinction between synchronic and diachronic emergence. The synchronic concept of emergent entities means that these are irreducible to their parts, e.g. the properties that these entities exhibit are not the properties of the entities’ parts and the relationships in which the entities plays a role are not relationships in which the parts of these entities could be found. On the other hand, the diachronic concept of emergence means that emergent entities appear in time; created as a truly new thing in the world. The diachronic conception emphasizes the emergence of new phenomena over time while the synchronic conception focuses on the coexistence of new "high-level" entities on a lower level. There is a general belief that these two concepts are different and that it is impossible to find a general unifying framework for them. It is the purpose of this paper to demonstrate that both concepts agree rather than diverge, and that creating an acceptable unifying framework for both terms of emergence is already possible.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Physical Emergence, Diachronic And Synchronic

This paper explicates two notions of emergence which are based on two ways of distinguishing levels of properties for dynamical systems. Once the levels are defined, the strategies of characterizing the relation of higher level to lower level properties as diachronic and synchronic emergence are the same. In each case, the higher level properties are said to be emergent if they are ‘novel’ or ‘...

متن کامل

Emergentism, Irreducibility, and Downward Causation

Several theories of emergence will be distinguished. In particular, these are synchronic, diachronic, and weak versions of emergence. While the weaker theories are compatible with property reductionism, synchronic emergentism and strong versions of diachronic emergentism are not. Synchronic emergentism is of particular interest for the discussion of downward causation. For such a theory, a syst...

متن کامل

Title : Mimetic gemination in Japanese : A challenge for Evolutionary Phonology

Blevins’s Evolutionary Phonology attempts to derive most if not all synchronic phonological patterns from diachronic changes: “[R]ecurrent synchronic sound patterns are a direct reflection of their diachronic origins, and, more specifically...regular phonetically based sound change is the common source of recurrent sound patterns. Evolutionary Phonology...investigates this hypothesis and explor...

متن کامل

Synchronic vs. Diachronic Naturalness: Hyman & Schuh (1974) revisited

In this paper I present and update some of the major points Russell Schuh and I made in our 1974 Linguistic Inquiry paper concerning universals of tone rules. Emphasis is on the distinction we made between synchronic and diachronic naturalness. Any diachronic change can be a synchronic rule while the reserve is not the case. We suggest(ed) that it is profitable to talk about natural synchronic ...

متن کامل

In search of ontological emergence: diachronic, but non-supervenient

Most philosophical accounts of emergence are based on supervenience, with supervenience being an ontologically synchronic relation of determination. This conception of emergence as a relation of supervenience, I will argue, is unable to make sense of the kinds of emergence that are widespread in selforganizing and nonlinear dynamical systems, including distributed cognitive systems. In these dy...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015