Convergent and incremental predictive validity of clinician, self-report, and structured interview diagnoses for personality disorders over 5 years.

نویسندگان

  • Douglas B Samuel
  • Charles A Sanislow
  • Christopher J Hopwood
  • M Tracie Shea
  • Andrew E Skodol
  • Leslie C Morey
  • Emily B Ansell
  • John C Markowitz
  • Mary C Zanarini
  • Carlos M Grilo
چکیده

OBJECTIVE Research has demonstrated poor agreement between clinician-assigned personality disorder (PD) diagnoses and those generated by self-report questionnaires and semistructured diagnostic interviews. No research has compared prospectively the predictive validity of these methods. We investigated the convergence of these 3 diagnostic methods and tested their relative and incremental validity in predicting independent, multimethod assessments of psychosocial functioning performed prospectively over 5 years. METHOD Participants were 320 patients in the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study diagnosed with PDs by therapist, self-report, and semistructured interview at baseline. We examined the relative incremental validity of therapists' naturalistic ratings relative to these other diagnostic methods for predicting psychosocial functioning at 5-year follow-up. RESULTS Hierarchical linear regression analyses revealed that both the self-report questionnaire and semistructured interview PD diagnoses had significant incremental predictive validity over the PD diagnoses assigned by a treating clinician. Although, in some cases, the clinicians' ratings for individual PDs did have validity for predicting subsequent functioning, they did not generally provide incremental prediction beyond the other methods. These findings remained robust in a series of analyses restricted to a subsample of therapist ratings based on clinical contact of 1 year or greater. CONCLUSIONS These results from a large clinical sample echo previous research documenting limited agreement between clinicians' naturalistic PD diagnoses and those from self-report and semistructured interview methods. They extend prior work by providing the first evidence about the relative predictive validity of these different methods. Our findings challenge the validity of naturalistic PD diagnoses and suggest the use of structured diagnostic instruments.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Validity of the DSM-Oriented scales of the Child Behavior Checklist and Youth Self-Report.

BACKGROUND The school-age versions of the ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment) incorporate the DSM-Oriented scales. These scales make it possible to quantify and normalize problems defined in the DSM. The objective was to study the incremental validity of the DSM-Oriented scales of the ASEBA inventories, the Child Behavior Checklist - CBCL, completed by parents of children a...

متن کامل

Validity of the DSM-Oriented Scales of the Child Behavior Checklist and Youth Self-Report

Resumen Background: The school-age versions of the ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment) incorporate the DSM-Oriented scales. These scales make it possible to quantify and normalize problems defi ned in the DSM. The objective was to study the incremental validity of the DSM-Oriented scales of the ASEBA inventories, the Child Behavior Checklist CBCL, completed by parents of ch...

متن کامل

Standardization of the Persian version of the self-report personality questionnaire (SCID-5-SPQ) in a clinical sample of Iranian population

Background and Aim: This study was conducted to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the Persian version of the self-report personality questionnaire (SCID-5-SPQ) in the clinical sample in Tehran. Method: This is a descriptive and survey study. The present study population includes outpatients and inpatients referred to three centers in Tehran, including Iran Psychiatric Medical Cen...

متن کامل

Validation of the Wisconsin Personality Disorders Inventory-IV with the SCID-II.

The Wisconsin Personality Disorders Inventory (WISPI-IV; Klein & Benjamin, 1996) is the latest version of a self-report measure of DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs) derived from an interpersonal perspective. When categorical diagnoses derived from the WISPI-IV were compared with independent SCID-II diagnoses, the majority of the kappas were poor (>.40). However, all but one of the effect sizes...

متن کامل

ارزیابی ابعاد شخصیت براساس پرسشنامه سرشت و منش کلونینجر 125- TCI در بیماران مبتلا به اختلال شخصیت مرزی

Background: The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) efficiently diagnoses personality disorders, differentiating the individual subtypes. This research aimed to evaluate personality dimensions using the Cloninger TCI (TCI-125) in a group of people with borderline personality disorders at Ruzbeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 27 borderline pers...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of consulting and clinical psychology

دوره 81 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013