Subjective significance judgments
نویسنده
چکیده
Observers were presented with random spatial distributions of dots, inside and outside a small highlighted region, and required to judge to what extent their density was significantly different. Experiment 1 examined whether the absolute density of the target area affects significance judgments, and evaluated the size of this bias compared to that of the normative statistical significance, using regression analysis; the regression weight of statistical significance was about four times larger than the absolute target value. Experiment 2 investigated the effect of increasing the size of the cells, which dilutes the dots in a larger area without affecting the statistical task. This factor produced a small residual effect, suggesting the involvement of a perceptual mechanism in statistical processing. The third experiment found that statistically explicit instructions both increases the influence of the statistical information and reduces the absolute density bias found in Experiment 1.
منابع مشابه
When does pain matter? Acknowledging the subjectivity of clinical significance.
The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines pain as ‘‘an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage,’’ acknowledging that ‘‘pain is always subjective’’ [20]. This definition, based on individual differences in pain perception, is the cornerstone of pain research and practice and is co...
متن کاملA fuzzy MCDM model with objective and subjective weights for evaluating service quality in hotel industries
This paper presents a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (FMCDM) model by integrating both subjective and objective weights for ranking and evaluating the service quality in hotels. The objective method selects weights of criteria through mathematical calculation, while the subjective method uses judgments of decision makers. In this paper, we use a combination of weights ob...
متن کاملOn empirical validation of compactness measures for electoral redistricting and its significance for application of models in the social sciences (Extended)∗
Use of optimization models in science and policy applications is often problematic because the best available models are very inaccurate representations of the originating problems. Such is the case with electoral districting models, for which there exist no generally accepted measures of compactness, in spite of many proposals and much analytical study. This paper reports on an experimental in...
متن کاملHuman Judgment under Sample Space Ignorance
This paper surveys results of a research program investigating human judgments of imprecise probabilities under sample space ignorance. The framework used for comparisons with human judgments is primarily due to Walley [9, 10]. The five studies reported here investigate four of Walley’s prescriptions for judgment under sample space ignorance, as well as assessing the impact of the number of obs...
متن کاملWhose Mind Matters More—The Agent or the Artist? An Investigation of Ethical and Aesthetic Evaluations
Theory of mind, the capacity for reasoning about mental states such as beliefs and intentions, represents a critical input to ethical and aesthetic evaluations. Did the agent cause harm on purpose? Were those brushstrokes intentional? The current study investigates theory of mind for moral and artistic judgments within the same paradigm. In particular, we target the role of intent for two kinds...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006