Implementing Default and Autoepistemic Logics via the Logic of GK

نویسندگان

  • Jianmin Ji
  • Hannes Strass
چکیده

The logic of knowledge and justified assumptions, also known as the logic of grounded knowledge (GK), was proposed by Lin and Shoham as a general logic for nonmonotonic reasoning. To date, it has been used to embed in it default logic (propositional case), autoepistemic logic, Turner’s logic of universal causation, and general logic programming under stable model semantics. Besides showing the generality of GK as a logic for nonmonotonic reasoning, these embeddings shed light on the relationships among these other logics. In this paper, for the first time, we show how the logic of GK can be embedded into disjunctive logic programming in a polynomial but non-modular translation with new variables. The result can then be used to compute the extension/expansion semantics of default logic, autoepistemic logic and Turner’s logic of universal causation by disjunctive ASP solvers such as GNT, cmodels, DLV, and claspD(-2).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

From Default and Autoepistemic Logics to Disjunctive Answer Set Programs via the Logic of GK

We show how the pure logic of GK can be embedded into disjunctive logic programming. The translation we present is polynomial, but not modular, and introduces new variables. The result can then be used to compute the extension/expansion semantics of default and autoepistemic logics using disjunctive ASP solvers.

متن کامل

From Turner's Logic of Universal Causation to the Logic of GK

Logic of knowledge and justified assumptions, also known as logic of grounded knowledge (GK), was proposed by Lin and Shoham as a general logic for nonmonotonic reasoning. To date, it has been used to embed in it default logic, autoepistemic logic, and general logic programming under stable model semantics. Besides showing the generality of GK as a logic for nonmonotonic reasoning, these embedd...

متن کامل

Modal non monotonic reasoning via boxed xed pointsGianni

In ACGP96] boxed expansions were introduced and new modal non mono-tonic logics, not contained in the families of logics identiied by Marek, Schwarz and Truszczy nski, was found to embed Reiter's default logic. Besides S4f, indeed also KD4Z was shown to be adequate to represent default logic. In this paper we show new results on the boxed xed point construction. In particular we prove that an i...

متن کامل

Combining Default Logic and Autoepistemic Logic

When we work with information from multiple sources, the formats of the knowledge bases may not be uniform. It would be desirable to be able to combine a knowledge base of default rules with one containing autoepistemic formulas. Previous works on relating default logic and autoepistemic logic mostly impose some constraints on autoepistemic logic, and thus are not suitable for combining the two...

متن کامل

Reiter's Default Logic Is a Logic of Autoepistemic Reasoning And a Good One, Too

A fact apparently not observed earlier in the literature of nonmonotonic reasoning is that Reiter, in his default logic paper, did not directly formalize informal defaults. Instead, he translated a default into a certain natural language proposition and provided a formalization of the latter. A few years later, Moore noted that propositions like the one used by Reiter are fundamentally differen...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1405.0809  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014