Insun05QA on QA Track of TREC 2005
نویسندگان
چکیده
This is the first time that our group takes part in the QA track. At TREC2005, the system we developed, Insun05QA, participated in the Main Task, which submitted answers to three types of questions: factoid questions, list questions and others questions. And we also submitted the document ranking which our answers are generated from. A new sentence similarity calculating method is used in our Insun05QA system. It can be considered as an extension of vector space model. And our QA system incorporates several useful tools. These tools include WordNet, developed by Princeton University, Minipar by Dekang Lin, and GATE, developed by University of Sheffield. Moreover, external knowledge such as knowledge from Internet is also widely used in our system. Since it is the first time that we take part in QA track and the preparing time is limited, we concentrate on the processing of factoid questions. And the methods we developed to process list and others questions are generated from the method used to process factoid questions. The structure of our Insun05QA system will be describe in Section 2, the details of how we process the factoid, list and others questions will be introduced in Section 3, and our results in TREC2005 will be presented in Section 4.
منابع مشابه
InsunQA06 on QA Track of TREC 2006
This is the second time that our group takes part in the QA track of TREC. We developed a question-answering system, named InsunQA06, based on our Insun05QA system, and with InsunQA06 we participated in the Main Task, which submitted answers to three types of questions: factoid questions, list questions and others questions. The structure of InsunQA06 is similar with the structure of Insun05QA....
متن کاملThe Evaluation of Question Answering Systems: Lessons Learned from the TREC QA Track
The TREC question answering (QA) track was the first large-scale evaluation of open-domain question answering systems. In addition to successfully fostering research on the QA task, the track has also been used to investigate appropriate evaluation methodologies for question answering systems. This paper gives a brief history of the TREC QA track, motivating the decisions made in its implementa...
متن کاملTREC 2005 Question Answering Experiments at Tokyo Institute of Technology
In this paper we describe Tokyo Institute of Technology’s submission to the TAC2008 question answering (QA) track. Keeping the same theoretical QA model as for the TREC2007 track, developed for factoid QA, we investigated the effects of retrieving blog data versus web data for rigid list questions. For squishy list questions we relied on sentence retrieval, similar to how we approached “other” ...
متن کاملFDUQA on TREC 2005 QA Track
In this year’s QA Track, we participant in the main and document ranking task and do not take part in the relation task. We put the most effort in factoid and definition questions, and very little on list questions and document ranking task. For factoid questions, we use three QA systems: system 1, system 2 and system 3. System 1 is very similar to our last year’s system [Wu et al, 2004] except...
متن کاملOverview of the TREC 2006 Question Answering Track 99
The TREC 2006 question answering (QA) track contained two tasks: the main task and the complex, interactive question answering (ciQA) task. As in 2005, the main task consisted of series of factoid, list, and “Other” questions organized around a set of targets; in contrast to previous years, the evaluation of factoid and list responses distinguished between answers that were globally correct (wi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005