سند علمی

Study on the application of external fixator and limited internal fixation in combined treatment of limbs fractures

چکیده

Objective: This study aims to investigate the application of external fixator and limited internal fixation in combined treatment of limbs fractures. Methods: From September 14th, 2015 to September 14th, 2016, a total number of 100 limbs fractured patients were collected in our hospital. They were randomly divided into two groups (the observation group and the control group) with 50 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received traditional treatment while patients in the observation group were treated with external fixation combined with limited internal fixation. The effect of the traditional and combined treatment was compared between the observation group and the control group. Results: In the observation group, the time of fracture healing was 42.45 ± 2.45 days, the recovery rate was 96%, the amount of hemorrhage was 47.55 ± 4.32 ml, the operation time was 68.48 ± 5.39 min, hospitalization time was 10.58 ± 3.65 d, Helfet score was 85.69 ± 5.43 and the incidence of postoperative adverse events was 2%. However, in the control group, the time of fracture healing was 53.96 ± 2.35 d, the recovery rate was 60%, the amount of hemorrhage was 69.81 ± 5.41 ml, the operation time turned out to be 79.62 ± 6.54 min, hospitalization time was 15.96 ± 4.84 d, Helfet score was 74.30 ± 2.31 and the incidence of postoperative adverse events was 24%. Conclusion: External fixator and limited internal fixation can improve the treatment safety of the patients with limb fracture.

اسناد مشابه

  • Comparison of outcomes of operatively treated bicondylar tibial plateau fractures by external fixation and internal fixation.

    سند علمی۲۰۱۲Malaysian orthopaedic journalCc Chan, J Keating

    ABSTRACT The outcome of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with either external fixation (35 patients) or internal fixation (24 patients) was reviewed. Outcome measures included the Rasmussen score, clinical complications, development of osteoarthritis and the requiremen

  • External Fixation vs. Skeletal Traction for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly.

    سند علمی۲۰۱۶Trauma monthlyGholam Hossein Kazemian, Mohammad Emami, Alireza Manafi, Farideh Najafi

    BACKGROUND Hip fractures are one of the causes of disability amongst elderly patients. External fixator and skeletal traction are two modes of treatment. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to compare two different treatment modes for intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patien

  • External fixation versus internal fixation for closed unstable intra-articular fracture of the distal radius. Early results from a prospective study.

    سند علمی۲۰۰۴The Medical journal of MalaysiaZ Zamzuri, M Yusof, M Y Hyzan

    This is a prospective study of a series of 26 patients with closed unstable comminuted intra-articular fracture distal end of the radius treated with two different methods of treatment to compare their anatomical and functional results. The external fixation group consisted of 12

  • external fixation vs. skeletal traction for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly

    مقالهtrauma monthlygholam hossein kazemian department of orthopedic surgery, imam hossein hospital, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran, mohammad emami department of orthopedic surgery, imam hossein hospital, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran, alireza manafi department of orthopedic surgery, imam hossein hospital, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran, farideh najafi department of orthopedic surgery, imam hossein hospital, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran; department of orthopedic surgery, imam hossein hospital, shahid beheshti university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran. tel: + 98-9123055582, fax: +98-3136273910

    patients and methods sixty elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were randomized for treatment with either skeletal traction (group a) or an external fixation (group b). in this study patients at least 60 years of age, with ao/ota a1 or a2 type fracture and intertroch

  • External Fixation Vs Orif in the Treatment of Bilateral Calcaneum Fracture

    سند علمی۲۰۱۵Journal of orthopaedic case reportsFulvio Carluzzo, G.F. Longo

    INTRODUCTION The following is an original case report in the literature of a patient with post-traumatic bilateral calcaneum fracture, both type III of Sanders' classification, that was treated, by the same surgeon, in the left foot with open reduction and internal fixation and i

  • Comparison of External Fixation and Internal Fixation of Unstable Distal Radius Fracture

    سند علمی۲۰۱۶Subhash Regmi, Hong-jun Liu, Nai-chen Zhang

    Management of patients with unstable DRFs is controversial. There is no definitive evidence to support one surgical fixation method over another. Currently, operative management of unstable DRFs mainly includes external fixation (EF) and internal fixation (IF). Few previous repor