IT Project Evaluation: Is More Formal Evaluation Necessarily Better?

نویسندگان

  • Graeme Thomas
  • Peter B. Seddon
  • Walter D. Fernández
چکیده

This paper explores effective IT project evaluation practices in Australia among 36 companies operating in three industry sectors: Finance and Insurance; Mining; and Electricity, Gas and Water Supply. Qualitative analysis of 78 interviews was used to determine characteristics of effective evaluation practices. The study suggests that more formal and sophisticated evaluation methods do not necessarily result in more effective evaluation or better IT project outcomes. Rather, effective IT project evaluation outcomes are more closely related to the drivers of behaviour in organisations such as accountability for results, top-leadership commitment, a strong IT-Business relationship, alignment to strategy, an effective measurement regime, and a willingness to take action. Simplicity and flexibility were also key characteristics underlying effective practices. These conclusions provide both theoretical and practical insights into the evaluation of IT projects in complex environments.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

TBM Tunneling Construction Time with Respect to Learning Phase Period and Normal Phase Period

In every tunnel boring machine (TBM) tunneling project, there is an initial low production phase so-called the Learning Phase Period (LPP), in which low utilization is experienced and the operational parameters are adjusted to match the working conditions. LPP can be crucial in scheduling and evaluating the final project time and cost, especially for short tunnels for which it may constitute a ...

متن کامل

AHP-based formal system for R&D project evaluation

The paper dwells on a judgement model for R&D project evaluation using multifactor criteria based on hierarchic considerations. The idea is to employ formal tools in quantification of subjective evaluations where expert judgement is involved. Comparative evaluations on a priority scale are converted to quantities using the eigen vector concept. This is also the essence of the Analytic Hierarchi...

متن کامل

Contemporary methods for evaluating complex project proposals

The ability to evaluate project proposals, assessing future success, and organizational value is critical to overall business performance for most enterprises. Yet, predicting project success is difficult and often unreliable. A four-year field study shows that the effectiveness of available methods for evaluating and selecting large, complex project depends on the specific project type, org...

متن کامل

Subjective Performance and the Value of Blind Evaluation∗

We investigate the incentive and project screening effects of anonymity in a setting of subjective performance evaluation. If the review process is “blind”, then the applicant’s (payoff relevant) type is hidden from the reviewer. If the process is nonblind or “informed”, then the reviewer observes the applicant’s type directly. In either case, the evaluator receives a noisy signal on the qualit...

متن کامل

Evaluation and comparison of management approaches (Ecological and Social-Ecological approaches) on soil fertility performance in Sarbisheh city

The purpose of this research was to investigate the interaction between the type of management approach and the type of combating desertification projects on soil fertility function and it is especially important in monitoring and evaluation of these projects. For this purpose, at the first, the range of three types of combating desertification projects including bush planting, constructing a c...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007