A Deduction Method Complete for Refutation and Finite Satisfiability
نویسندگان
چکیده
Database and Artiicial Intelligence applications are brieey discussed and it is argued that they need deduction methods that are not only refutation complete but also complete for nite satissability. A novel deduction method is introduced for such applications. Instead of relying on Skolemization, as most refutation methods do, the proposed method processes existential quantiiers in a special manner which makes it complete not only for refutation, but also for nite satissability. A main contribution of this paper is the proof of these results.
منابع مشابه
Proving Finite Satisfiability of Deductive Databases
It is shown how certain refutation methods can be extended into semi-decision procedures that are complete for both unsatisfiability and finite satisfiability. The proposed extension is justified by a new characterization of finite satisfiability. This research was motivated by a database design problem: Deduction rules and integrity constraints in definite databases have to be finitely satisfi...
متن کاملOn Functions Computable in Nondeterministic Polynomial Time: Some Characterizations
It is shown how certain refutation methods can be extended into semi-decision procedures that are complete for both unsatisfiability and finite satisfiability. The proposed extension is justified by a new characterization of finite satisfiability. This research was motivated by a database design problem: Deduction rules and integrity constraints in definite databases have to be finitely satisfi...
متن کاملChecking Consistency of Database Constraints: a Logical Basis
This paper addresses the problem of consistency of a set of integrity con4raints itself, independent from any state. 11 is pointed out that database constraints have not only to ,be consistent. but in addition to be finitely .+atisfiablc. Thb stronger property reflects that the constraints have to admit a finite set of [stored ps well as derivqble) facts. As opposed .tu consistency. being undec...
متن کاملA Logic of Graded Possibility and Certainty Coping with Partial Inconsistency
A semantics is given to possibilistic logic, a logic that handles weighted classical logic formulae, and where weights are interpreted as lower bounds on degrees of certainty or possibility, in the sense of Zadeh's possibility theory. The proposed semantics is based on fuzzy sets of interpretations. It is tolerant to partial inconsistency. Satisfiability is extended from interpretations to fuzz...
متن کاملLogic as Energy: A SAT-Based Approach
This paper presents the implementation of ARQ-PROP II, a limited-depth propositional reasoner, via the compilation of its specification into an exact formulation using the satyrus platform. satyrus’ compiler takes as input the definition of a problem as a set of pseudoBoolean constraints and produces, as output, the Energy function of a higher-order artificial neural network. This way, satisfia...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998