Using Randomization Tests to Preserve Type I Error With Response-Adaptive and Covariate-Adaptive Randomization.
نویسندگان
چکیده
We demonstrate that clinical trials using response adaptive randomized treatment assignment rules are subject to substantial bias if there are time trends in unknown prognostic factors and standard methods of analysis are used. We develop a general class of randomization tests based on generating the null distribution of a general test statistic by repeating the adaptive randomized treatment assignment rule holding fixed the sequence of outcome values and covariate vectors actually observed in the trial. We develop broad conditions on the adaptive randomization method and the stochastic mechanism by which outcomes and covariate vectors are sampled that ensure that the type I error is controlled at the level of the randomization test. These conditions ensure that the use of the randomization test protects the type I error against time trends that are independent of the treatment assignments. Under some conditions in which the prognosis of future patients is determined by knowledge of the current randomization weights, the type I error is not strictly protected. We show that response-adaptive randomization can result in substantial reduction in statistical power when the type I error is preserved. Our results also ensure that type I error is controlled at the level of the randomization test for adaptive stratification designs used for balancing covariates.
منابع مشابه
In the Pursuit of Balanced Groups: A SAS® Macro for an Adaptive Randomization Test
In adaptive randomized experiments, researchers verify that random allocation yielded equivalent experimental groups before proceeding with data analysis. Given a precise definition of balanced groups (e.g., Cohen’s d < 0.5 for a continuous covariate), researchers may plan to keep reshuffling participants until balance is achieved. However, reshuffling can invalidate standard parametric tests, ...
متن کاملWorth adapting? Revisiting the usefulness of outcome-adaptive randomization.
Outcome-adaptive randomization allocates more patients to the better treatments as the information accumulates in the trial. Is it worth it to apply outcome-adaptive randomization in clinical trials? Different views permeate the medical and statistical communities. We provide additional insights to the question by conducting extensive simulation studies. Trials are designed to maintain the type...
متن کاملStatistics in Clinical Cancer Research Worth Adapting? Revisiting the Usefulness of Outcome-Adaptive Randomization
Outcome-adaptive randomization allocates more patients to the better treatments as the information accumulates in the trial. Is it worth it to apply outcome-adaptive randomization in clinical trials? Different views permeate the medical and statistical communities. We provide additional insights to the question by conducting extensive simulation studies. Trials are designed to maintain the type...
متن کاملRandomization in substance abuse clinical trials
BACKGROUND A well designed randomized clinical trial rates as the highest level of evidence for a particular intervention's efficacy. Randomization, a fundamental feature of clinical trials design, is a process invoking the use of probability to assign treatment interventions to patients. In general, randomization techniques pursue the goal of providing objectivity to the assignment of treatmen...
متن کاملTwo-Way Minimization: A Novel Treatment Allocation Method for Small Trials
Randomization is a hallmark of clinical trials. If a trial entails very few subjects and has many prognostic factors (or many factor levels) to be balanced, minimization is a more efficient method to achieve balance than a simple randomization. We propose a novel minimization method, the 'two-way minimization'. The method separately calculates the 'imbalance in the total numbers of subjects' an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Statistics & probability letters
دوره 81 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011