Supermodularity and Complementarity in Economics: An Elementary Survey∗

نویسنده

  • Rabah Amir
چکیده

The literature on supermodular optimization and games is surveyed from the perspective of potential users in economics. This methodology provides a new approach for comparative statics based only on critical assumptions, and allows a general analysis of games with strategic complementarities. The results are presented in a simplified yet rigourous manner, without reference to lattice theory, for the special case of onedimensional parameter and actions sets, with the emphasis being on wide accessibility. Detailed applications are presented for well-known models of consumer behavior, monopoly pass-through, Bertrand and Cournot competition, strategic R§D, search and matching. Wherever appropriate, useful tricks for applications and comparative comments are inserted. JEL codes: A23, C60, C72, D43.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Survey on Supermodular Games

Supermodular games are an interesting class of games that exhibits strategic complementarity. There are several compelling reasons like existence of pure strategy nash equilibrium, dominance solvability, identical bounds on joint strategy space etc. that make them a strong candidate for game theoretic modeling of economics. Supermodular games give a sound framework for analysis as it is based o...

متن کامل

Supermodularity is not Falsifiable∗

Supermodularity has long been regarded as a natural notion of complementarities in individual decision making; it was introduced as such in the nineteenth century by Edgeworth and Pareto. But supermodularity is not an ordinal property. We study the ordinal content of assuming a supermodular utility, i.e. what it means for the individual’s underlying preferences. We show that supermodularity is ...

متن کامل

Incomplete preferences, complementarity and non-convexity

This paper extends to incomplete preferences the formulation of strategic complementarity in Milgrom and Shannon (1994). It is shown, by example, that quasi-supermodularity and single-crossing no longer su¢ce to guarantee monotone comparative statics with incomplete preferences. However, when incomplete preferences satisfy monotone closure in addition to quasi-supermodularity and single-crossin...

متن کامل

Core Discussion Paper 2001/49 on Strategic Complementarity Conditions in Bertrand Oligopoly

For Bertrand duopoly with linear costs, we establish via a single counterexample that: (i) A new monotone transformation of the firms’ profit functions may lead to the supermodularity of transformed profits when the standard log and identity transformations both fail, and (ii) Topkis’s notion of critical sufficient condition for monotonicity of a Bertrand firm’s best-reply correspondence cannot...

متن کامل

Complementarity with incomplete preferences

This paper extends the formulation of complementarity in Milgrom and Shannon (1994) to the case of incomplete but acyclic preferences. It is shown that the problem can be reformulated as one with complete but intransitive preferences. In this case, quasi-supermodularity and single-crossing on their own do not guarantee either monotone comparative statics or equilibrium existence in pure strateg...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004