Evidence production in adversarial vs . inquisitorial regimes

نویسندگان

  • Luke M. Froeb
  • Bruce H. Kobayashi
چکیده

The advantage of the adversarial regime of judicial decision-making is the superior information of the parties, while the advantage of an idealized inquisitorial regime is its neutrality. We model the tradeoff by characterizing the properties of costly estimators used by each regime. The adversarial regime uses an ‘extremal’ estimator that is based on the difference between the most favorable pieces of evidence produced by each party. The inquisitorial regime uses the sample mean. We find that neither regime dominates the other.  2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Beyond Standards of Proof: Accuracy and Frugality of Different Legal Systems

Different standards of proof are applied under the common law systems and the civil law systems. The reason is that the common-law adversarial systems rely on litigating parties to produce evidence while the civil-law inquisitorial systems rely on impartial judges to produce evidence, so the collections of evidence presented to the court are largely different. This paper analyzes the adversaria...

متن کامل

JudiCiaL REfoRms in Russia : 1864 to 2014

In 2014 we celebrate the 150 anniversary of the Judicial Reform in Russia. The 1860 are known as a time of major reforms in various spheres of life, one of them being the Judicial Reform adopted in 1864. Before 1864 civil procedure was considered to be the classical form of inquisitorial justice with active judges and passive parties. Inquisitorial procedure was a written process conducted in s...

متن کامل

The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth

This discussion aims to provide the occasional medical expert witness with background knowledge of the adversarial court system and the role of the medical expert witness within it. The parallel evolution of the adversarial and inquisitorial legal systems has been more out of tradition rather than any systematic review of the effectiveness of one system or the other. Both legal systems have the...

متن کامل

The Public Defender as International Transplant

The last quarter century has seen countries across Latin America and other parts of the world dramatically transition from an inquisitorial criminal justice system to an adversarial system. As a part of this shift in adjudication, these systems have adopted a key component of the adversarial system: the public defender. But while the formal and structural changes in these systems have been prof...

متن کامل

Toward a Comparative Economics of Plea Bargaining (with Thomas Miceli)

We attempt to open a path to the comparative analysis of criminal procedure by superimposing the efficiency principle onto an adversarial system characterized by an aversion to false convictions and an inquisitorial system characterized by a desire to justly punish the guilty. We begin with a general model of plea bargaining, embed it in a larger framework that addresses the costs of adjudicati...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000