Tuning Belief Revision for Coordination with Inconsistent Teammates
نویسندگان
چکیده
Coordination with an unknown human teammate is a notable challenge for cooperative agents. Behavior of human players in games with cooperating AI agents is often sub-optimal and inconsistent leading to choreographed and limited cooperative scenarios in games. This paper considers the difficulty of cooperating with a teammate whose goal and corresponding behavior change periodically. Previous work uses Bayesian models for updating beliefs about cooperating agents based on observations. We describe belief models for on-line planning, discuss tuning in the presence of noisy observations, and demonstrate empirically its effectiveness in coordinating with inconsistent agents in a simple domain. Further work in this area promises to lead to techniques for more interesting cooperative AI in games.
منابع مشابه
Paraconsistent Justification Logic: a Starting Point
In his 2003 paper, Ten philosophical problems in belief revision, Sven Ove Hansson argues that sometimes belief revision might essentially involve inconsistent epistemic states, and that to better model belief revision requires well modeling inconsistent epistemic states. In this paper, we are going to develop a type of justification logic, which is intended to model the agent’s justification s...
متن کاملInformation structures in belief revision
Belief revision theories address the problem of rationally integrating new pieces of information into an agent’s belief state. Belief states themselves are represented by certain kinds of information structures. The most interesting and most closely studied type of belief revision is the one in which the new information is inconsistent with the agent’s current beliefs. The main question of the ...
متن کاملAutoepistemic Belief-revision for Integration of Mutually Inconsistent Knowledge
It is well known that the standard 3-valued logic programs with constraints can be inconsistent. Because of that we can not use it for a data integration where mutually inconsistent information comes from different data sources. We argue that a natural way to answer to this challenge, without collapsing all sentences into inconsistency, is by passing to 4-valued bilattice-based logic (with logi...
متن کاملThe Use of the Belief Revision Concept to Ontology Revision
Ontology is a formal explicit specification of shared conceptualisation. Ontology revision refers to revising the ontology as a result of learning or when new knowledge is gained. This paper discusses the possibility of using the concept of belief revision as a basis for ontology revision. Belief revision is concerned with the approach of updating and revising a belief set so that it remains co...
متن کاملPlan-belief Revision in Jason
When information is shared between agents of unknown reliability, it is possible that their belief bases become inconsistent. In such cases, the belief base must be revised to restore consistency, so that the agent is able to reason. In some cases the inconsistent information may be due to use of incorrect plans. We extend work by Alechina et al. to revise belief bases in which plans can be dyn...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015