The negotiable alternatives identifier for group negotiation support
نویسندگان
چکیده
It has been observed that in single voting unanimity can rarely be reached. In many situations, however, members may not be aware that their preferences as expressed by their votes may contain room for compromise. This paper proposes a consensus-seeking methodology ± the Negotiable Alternatives Identi®er (NAI) ± that searches for such a compromise. Starting with individual cardinal preferences on alternatives, NAI classi®es alternatives into three classes of preferences: the most preferred, the less preferred and the least preferred. Within each class, relatively small dierences in preferences among alternatives may make it reasonable for a decision maker to consider them interchangeable. As a result of this ̄exibility, a collective solution acceptable to all decision makers can be generated. In this paper we provide some theorems and their proofs to address the extreme conditions of the proposed heuristic. Also we provide an example to illustrate how to use the proposed heuristic to solve a real-world problem. Ó 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Personalized Services with Negotiable Privacy Policies
This paper examines how negotiation techniques can resolve the trade-off between service providers’ personalization efforts and users’ individual privacy concerns, how they lead to efficient contracts, and how they can be integrated into existing technologies to overcome the shortcomings of static privacy policies. The analysis includes the identification of relevant and negotiable privacy dime...
متن کاملAgreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation
This paper presents a conceptual model of agreement options on negotiation support for civil engineering decision. The negotiation support facilitates the solving of group choice decision making problems in civil engineering decision to reduce the impact of mud volcano disaster in Sidoarjo, Indonesia. The approach based on application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for multi crite...
متن کاملA Matchmaking Component for the Discovery of Agreement and Negotiation Spaces in Electronic Markets
This paper presents the design of an extended matchmaking component for electronic markets, which is able to identify negotiable agreements and the issues that are subject to the negotiation, in the case where basic matchmaking fails to find agreements that satisfy the constraints of the seller and the buyer. The foundation for this functionality is the introduction of negotiable constraints wi...
متن کاملComposite alternatives in group decision support
Decision theoretic models of group decision processes usually assume a given set of alternatives, about which the decision has to take place. In realistic group decision situations, however, alternatives are often not specified a priori, but are created during the group process from different components introduced by the group members. This paper develops methods for systematically creating suc...
متن کاملComputer-Aided Tools in Negotiation: Negotiable Issues, Counterfactual Thinking, and Satisfaction
Computer-Aided Tools in Negotiation: Negotiable Issues, Counterfactual Thinking, and Satisfaction Terence T. Ow, Bonnie S. O’Neill & Charles E. Naquin a Department of Management, College of Business Administration, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA b Department of Management, Kellstadt Graduate School of Business, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA Accepted author version p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Applied Mathematics and Computation
دوره 104 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999