Embolic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Effective Anticoagulation: Value of Transesophageal Echocardiography to Guide Direct-Current Cardioversion

OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to evaluate the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided cardioversion to prevent thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and effective anticoagulation (International Normalized Ratio of 2 or 3) at least three weeks before cardioversion. BACKGROUND Transesophageal echocardiography has been proposed as a method of screening patients for left atrial thrombi before direct-current cardioversion of AF. The usefulness of TEE as a screening tool has always been evaluated in patients without long-term anticoagulation before cardioversion. METHODS This prospective, single-center, observational study, performed on an intention-to-cardiovert basis, comprised 1,076 consecutive, unselected patients with AF. The initial two years were designed to be the control phase, during which the conventional approach was used. After that, cardioversion guided by TEE was performed in consecutive patients. RESULTS The prevalence of left atrial thrombi was 7.7% in patients with persistent AF and effective anticoagulation. During the first four weeks after electrical cardioversion, six thromboembolic complications were observed in patients in whom the TEE-guided approach was employed (6 [0.8%] of 719 patients), compared with three thromboembolic complications in patients in whom the conventional approach was used (3 [0.8%] of 357 patients). None of the patients in whom electrical cardioversion was not performed experienced an embolic event. CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in the rate of embolic events between the two treatment groups. In patients with AF and effective anticoagulation, TEE-guided electrical cardioversion does not reduce the embolic risk. However, TEE revealed left atrial thrombi in 7.7% of patients with AF and effective anticoagulation, before direct-current cardioversion. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1436–42) © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation