The use of systematic reviews in the design of randomised trials

نویسندگان

  • Ashley P Jones
  • Carrol Gamble
  • Mike Clarke
  • Paula R Williamson
چکیده

New randomised trials should be planned and reported taking account of knowledge from a systematic review of the existing research, but there is little empirical evidence to show how systematic reviews are used in the planning stages of new trials. A systematic review could be used to inform the design of a new trial in several ways: (1) to choose the most appropriate forms of the interventions for the experimental and control groups, (2) to inform the sample size calculation (e.g. an estimate of the standard deviation), (3) to aid the choice decision of outcomes to measure (or the definition of an outcome), (4) to identify potential problems with consent, treatment withdrawal or retention, (5) to predict likely adverse events that may not otherwise be expected. Furthermore, a systematic review could be used to conduct a sample size calculation for an updated metaanalysis incorporating the existing evidence and the eventual findings of the trial being planned. Although there is debate as to whether a trial should be powered in its own right or as part of an updated meta-analysis, there might be outcomes that will only have adequate power in the context of a meta-analysis. Among the issues to consider are whether the trial is justified if the existing meta-analysis is significant, whether it is possible to conduct a trial involving fewer patients and thus reach a decision on the most appropriate treatment earlier, and whether statistical heterogeneity might require the trial to be larger than the estimate if it was powered in isolation. We present a sources of data on the use of systematic reviews in the design and conduct of randomised trials: a cohort of HTA-funded studies in which we explore how the trial design was informed by the existing evidence base. Our findings will provide important information for trialists and trial funders.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Rivers of Evidence

There has been too much of a one-way flow drift down a river of evidence. Researchers from rich countries have produced the primary evidence which they proceed to summarise within reviews. These summaries have directed care worldwide. However, things are changing and the river of evidence can flow in the other direction. The care of women with eclampsia has been changed or refined throughout th...

متن کامل

The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials

BACKGROUND A systematic review, with or without a meta-analysis, should be undertaken to determine if the research question of interest has already been answered before a new trial begins. There has been limited research on how systematic reviews are used within the design of new trials, the aims of this study were to investigate how systematic reviews of earlier trials are used in the planning...

متن کامل

The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols

BACKGROUND It is important that planned randomised trials are justified and placed in the context of the available evidence. The SPIRIT guidelines for reporting clinical trial protocols recommend that a recent and relevant systematic review should be included. The aim of this study was to assess the use of the existing evidence in order to justify trial conduct. METHODS Protocols of randomise...

متن کامل

The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews: Addressing Questions of Prevalence

Background Recently there has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Key features of a systematic review include the creation of an a priori protocol, clear inclusion criteria, a structured and systematic search process, critical appraisal of studies, and a formal process of data extraction followed by methods to synthesize, or combin...

متن کامل

Some Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”

Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...

متن کامل

Effect of Medicinal Herbs on Primary Dysmenorrhoea- a Systematic Review

Conventional treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea has a failure rate of 20% to 25% and may be contraindicated or not tolerated by some women. Herbal medicine may be a suitable alternative. The objective of the manuscript, is determine the efficacy and safety of some Iranian herbal medicine for primary dysmenorrhea when compared with placebo, no treatment, and other treatment. For this target ele...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 12  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011