More on modal aspects of default logic

نویسندگان

  • Victor W. Marek
  • Miroslaw Truszczynski
چکیده

Investigations of default logic have been so far mostly concerned with the notion of an extension of a default theory. It turns out, however, that default logic is much richer. Namely, there are other natural classes of objects that might be associated with default reasoning. We study two such classes of objects with emphasis on their relations with modal nonmonotonic formalisms. First, we introduce the concept of a weak extension and study its properties. It has long been suspected that there are close connections between default and autoepistemic logics. The notion of weak extension allows us to precisely describe the relationship between these two formalisms. In particular, we show that default logic with weak extensions is essentially equivalent to autoepistemic logic, that is, nonmonotonic logic KD45. In the paper we also study the notion of a set of formulas closed under a default theory. These objects are shown to correspond to stable theories and to modal logic S5. In particular, we show that skeptical reasoning with sets closed under default theories is closely related with provability in S5. As an application of our results we determine the complexity of reasoning with weak extensions and sets closed under default theories.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Modal Logic S4F, the Default Logic, and the Logic Here-and-There

The modal logic S4F provides an account for the default logic of Reiter, and several modal nonmonotonic logics of knowledge and belief. In this paper we focus on a fragment of the logic S4F concerned with modal formulas called modal defaults, and on sets of modal defaults — modal default theories. We present characterizations of S4F-expansions of modal default theories, and show that strong and...

متن کامل

Computing Default Extensions by Reductions on O

Based on a set of simple logical equivalences we define a rewriting procedure that computes extensions in the propositional fragment of the logic of O introduced by Lakemeyer and Levesque. This logic is capable of representing default logic with the advantage of itself being monotonic, with a clearly defined semantics and a separation of the object level and the meta level. The procedure prepar...

متن کامل

Modal Interpretations of Default Logic

In the paper we study a new and natural modal interpretat ion of defaults. We show that under this interpretat ion there are whole families of modal nonmonotonic logics that accurately represent default reasoning. One of these logics is used in a definition of possible-worlds semantics for default logic. This semantics yields a characterization of default extensions similar to the characterizat...

متن کامل

Suhrawardi's Modal Syllogisms

Suhrawardi’s logic of the Hikmat al-Ishraq is basically modal. So to understand his modal logic one first has to know the non-modal part upon which his modal logic is built. In my previous paper ‘Suhrawardi on Syllogisms’(3) I discussed the former in detail. The present paper is an exposition of his treatment of modal syllogisms. On the basis of some reasonable existential presuppositi...

متن کامل

Non-monotonic modal logic of belief

We propose an alternative non-monotonic modal formalism called non-monotonic modal logic of belief. It is based on replacing the classical fixpoint equation E = ThS(A ∪ {Mφ : E 6`S ¬φ}) with the belief fixpoint equation E = ThS(A ∪ {Mφ : E 6`S ¬Mφ}). The solutions of the belief fixpoint equation, called belief S-expansions, are tightly related to the logic of belief KD45. We show interpretation...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Fundam. Inform.

دوره 17  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1992