A ] 1 9 Fe b 20 06 Matrix units associated with the split basis of a Leonard pair Kazumasa Nomura and

نویسندگان

  • Kazumasa Nomura
  • Paul Terwilliger
چکیده

Let K denote a field, and let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A∗ : V → V that satisfy (i), (ii) below: (i) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A∗ is diagonal. (ii) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A∗ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal. We call such a pair a Leonard pair on V . It is known that there exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is lower bidiagonal and the matrix representing A∗ is upper bidiagonal. In this paper we give some formulae involving the matrix units associated with this basis. 1 Leonard pairs and Leonard systems We begin by recalling the notion of a Leonard pair. We will use the following terms. A square matrix X is said to be tridiagonal whenever each nonzero entry lies on either the diagonal, the subdiagonal, or the superdiagonal. Assume X is tridiagonal. Then X is said to be irreducible whenever each entry on the subdiagonal is nonzero and each entry on the superdiagonal is nonzero. We now define a Leonard pair. For the rest of this paper K will denote a field. Definition 1.1 [18] Let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension. By a Leonard pair on V we mean an ordered pair (A,A), where A : V → V and A : V → V are linear transformations that satisfy (i), (ii) below: (i) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal. (ii) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal. Note 1.2 It is a common notational convention to use A to represent the conjugatetranspose of A. We are not using this convention. In a Leonard pair (A,A) the linear transformations A and A are arbitrary subject to (i) and (ii) above. We refer the reader to [3], [9], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [29], [30] for background on Leonard pairs. We especially recommend the survey [27]. See [1], [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [10], [11], [19], [28] for related topics. It is known that there exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is lower bidiagonal and the matrix representing A is upper bidiagonal [18, Theorem 3.2]. In this paper we give some formulae involving the matrix units associated with this basis. We also display some related formulae involving the primitive idempotents of A and A, which might be of independent interest. When working with a Leonard pair, it is convenient to consider a closely related object called a Leonard system. To prepare for our definition of a Leonard system, we recall a few concepts from linear algebra. Let d denote a nonnegative integer and let Matd+1(K) denote the K-algebra consisting of all d+ 1 by d + 1 matrices that have entries in K. We index the rows and columns by 0, 1, . . . , d. For the rest of this paper we let A denote a K-algebra isomorphic to Matd+1(K). Let V denote a simple A-module. We remark that V is unique up to isomorphism of A-modules, and that V has dimension d + 1. Let v0, v1, . . . , vd denote a basis for V . For X ∈ A and Y ∈ Matd+1(K), we say Y represents X with respect to v0, v1, . . . , vd whenever Xvj = ∑d i=0 Yijvi for 0 ≤ j ≤ d. For A ∈ A we say A is multiplicity-free whenever it has d+1 mutually distinct eigenvalues in K. Assume A is multiplicity-free. Let θ0, θ1, . . . , θd denote an ordering of the eigenvalues of A, and for 0 ≤ i ≤ d put Ei = ∏ 0≤j≤d j 6=i A− θjI θi − θj , (1) where I denotes the identity of A. We observe (i) AEi = θiEi (0 ≤ i ≤ d); (ii) EiEj = δi,jEi (0 ≤ i, j ≤ d); (iii) ∑d i=0 Ei = I; (iv) A = ∑d i=0 θiEi. We call Ei the primitive idempotent of A associated with θi. By a Leonard pair in A we mean an ordered pair of elements in A that act on V as a Leonard pair in the sense of Definition 1.1. We now define a Leonard system. Definition 1.3 [18] By a Leonard system in A we mean a sequence (A; {Ei} d i=0;A ; {E i } d i=0) that satisfies (i)–(v) below. (i) Each of A, A is a multiplicity-free element in A. (ii) E0, E1, . . . , Ed is an ordering of the primitive idempotents of A. (iii) E 0 , E ∗ 1 , . . . , E ∗ d is an ordering of the primitive idempotents of A . (iv) For 0 ≤ i, j ≤ d, EiA Ej = { 0 if |i− j| > 1, 6= 0 if |i− j| = 1.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Some trace formulae involving the split sequences of a Leonard pair

Let K denote a field, and let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A∗ : V → V that satisfy (i), (ii) below: (i) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A∗ is diagonal. (ii) There exists a basis for V with respect to which ...

متن کامل

1 1 M ay 2 00 6 Linear transformations that are tridiagonal with respect to both eigenbases of a Leonard pair

Let K denote a field, and let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A∗ : V → V that satisfy (i) and (ii) below: (i) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A∗ is diagonal. (ii) There exists a basis for V with respect to whi...

متن کامل

The switching element for a Leonard pair

Let V denote a vector space with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A : V → V that satisfy (i) and (ii) below: (i) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal. (ii) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irr...

متن کامل

A ] 2 6 N ov 2 00 5 The determinant of AA ∗ − A ∗ A for a Leonard pair A , A ∗

Let K denote a field, and let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A∗ : V → V that satisfy (i), (ii) below: (i) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A∗ is diagonal. (ii) There exists a basis for V with respect to which ...

متن کامل

ar X iv : m at h / 03 06 30 1 v 1 [ m at h . Q A ] 1 9 Ju n 20 03 Leonard pairs and the q - Racah polynomials ∗

Let K denote a field, and let V denote a vector space over K with finite positive dimension. We consider a pair of linear transformations A : V → V and A : V → V which satisfy the following two conditions: (i) There exists a basis for V with respect to which the matrix representing A is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing A is diagonal. (ii) There exists a basis for V with respe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008