Illusions in modal reasoning.

نویسندگان

  • Y Goldvarg
  • P N Johnson-Laird
چکیده

According to the mental model theory, models represent what is true, but not what is false. One unexpected consequence is that certain inferences should have compelling, but invalid, conclusions. Three experiments corroborated the occurrence of such illusions in reasoning about possibilities. When problems had the heading "Only one of the premises is true," the participants considered the truth of each premise in turn, but neglected the fact that when one premise is true, the others are false. When two-premise problems had the heading "One of the premises is true and one is false," the participants still neglected the falsity of one of the premises. As predicted, however, the illusions were reduced when reasoners were told to check their conclusions against the constraint that only one of the premises was true. We discuss alternative explanations for illusory inferences and their implications for current theories of reasoning.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Sound-induced Flash Illusions as a Paradigm of Multisensorial Integration: a Review Article

Sound-induced flash illusions, first described in 2000, provide a valid example of perception as a multisensorial experience where all sensorial modalities work together. Audio-visual illusions can be classified in “fission” and “fusion” illusions. Whether one flash is accompanied by two or three auditory stimuli (or beeps), it’s often perceived as multiple flashes (fission illusion), by contra...

متن کامل

Illusions in reasoning about consistency.

Reasoners succumb to predictable illusions in evaluating whether sets of assertions are consistent. We report two studies of this computationally intractable task of "satisfiability." The results show that as the number of possibilities compatible with the assertions increases, the difficulty of the task increases, and that reasoners represent what is true according to assertions, not what is f...

متن کامل

No Fool ' s Cold : Notes on Illusions of Possibility 1

A lot of philosophers are pessimistic about conceivability evidence. They think it doesn't prove, or even go very far towards justifying, interesting modal conclusions. A number of other philosophers are optimistic; they think it does justify, and perhaps even establish beyond a reasonable doubt, that lots of interesting things are possible. Nothing very surprising there. What is slightly surpr...

متن کامل

A Modal Characterization of Granular Reasoning Based on Scott – Montague Models

Granular reasoning proposed by Murai et al. is a mechanism for reasoning using granular computing, and the concept of “focus” has been proposed as a key concept of granular reasoning. On the other hand, the authors have proposed another concept of granularity, called “visibility”. In this paper, we try to capture the concepts of visibility and focus as modalities of modal logics by introducing ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Memory & cognition

دوره 28 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000