UTDHLT: COPACETIC System for Choosing Plausible Alternatives
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Choice of Plausible Alternatives (COPA) task in SemEval-2012 presents a series of forced-choice questions wherein each question provides a premise and two viable cause or effect scenarios. The correct answer is the cause or effect that is the most plausible. This paper describes the COPACETIC system developed by the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) for this task. We approach this task by casting it as a classification problem and using features derived from bigram co-occurrences, TimeML temporal links between events, single-word polarities from the Harvard General Inquirer, and causal syntactic dependency structures within the gigaword corpus. Additionally, we show that although each of these components improves our score for this evaluation, the difference in accuracy between using all of these features and using bigram co-occurrence information alone is not statistically significant.
منابع مشابه
What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.
Three experiments investigated how font emphasis influences reading and remembering discourse. Although past work suggests that contrastive pitch contours benefit memory by promoting encoding of salient alternatives, it is unclear both whether this effect generalizes to other forms of linguistic prominence and how the set of alternatives is constrained. Participants read discourses in which som...
متن کاملTemptation–Driven Preferences1
“My own behavior baffles me. For I find myself not doing what I really want to do but doing what I really loathe.” Saint Paul Gul–Pesendorfer [2001] give a decision–theoretic model of temptation building on a framework of Dekel, Lipman, and Rustichini [2001]. We argue that the axiom they use to identify temptation, set betweenness, rules out plausible and interesting forms of temptation. We pro...
متن کاملA Logic for Collective Choice
This paper presents a modal logic for modelling individual and collective choices over a set of feasible alternatives. The logic extends propositional logic with a binary modality so that a formula can express not only properties of alternatives but also priorities of individuals over the properties. More importantly, each formula of this logic determines a preference ordering over alternatives...
متن کاملFormation of well-justified composite explanatory hypotheses despite the threat of combinatorial explosion
The formation of well-justified explanatory theories in science appears to be computationally intractable. This is so because explanatory theories are composite hypotheses, which are combinatorially explosive to assemble, and because justification requires comparing a putative best explanation with all plausible alternative explanations, of which there are too many. Nevertheless, by carefully d...
متن کاملWhat happened (and what did not): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives
Three experiments investigated how font emphasis influences reading and remembering discourse. Although past work suggests that contrastive pitch contours benefit memory by promoting encoding of salient alternatives, it is unclear both whether this effect generalizes to other forms of linguistic prominence and how the set of alternatives is constrained. Participants read discourses in which som...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012