Semantic Enhanced Argumentation Based Group Decision Making for Complex Problems
نویسنده
چکیده
This is a questionnaire is designed for evaluating a group argumentation based decision making prototype system, which is a part of my PhD research. A task driven experiment has been designed, during the experiment the participants will be asked to use a developed group argumentation based decision making software system to carry out group discussion around the task, the discussion will be recorded and analysed by the system. Based on the group discussion, the system will identify the different aspects of the task and evaluate the candidate solution proposed by group members to give an advisable conclusion. The experiment will last 45 min, which include 30 min computer supported group discussion and 15 min decision making process demo. The questionnaire is divided into 3 parts, namely pre-session, mid-session and post-session. You should complete these three parts respectively before experiment, during experiment and after experiment. Your answers are very important to the evaluation of our system and to the future research. Thank you for your assistance
منابع مشابه
A Semantic Enhanced Framework for Argumentation Based Group Decision Support
By an effective Group Decision Support System (GDSS) group members can be supported to identify the problem, form possible actions, resolve the conflict and achieve the joint goals. Throughout such a group decision making process, argumentation is widely regarded as a good means to propose the ideas, justify possible alternatives and convince others to achieve group consensus. In this paper, ar...
متن کاملExtensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision-making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment
Multi-criteria group decision-making is a process in which decision makers assess the performance of alternatives on the basis of conflicting criteria to opt the most worthy alternative as solution. TOPSIS and ELECTRE are effective and commonly used methods to solve multiple criteria decision-making problems. The aim of this study is to propose two new models, namely, complex Pythagorean fuzzy ...
متن کاملGroup Decision Making based on a New Evaluation Method and Hesitant Fuzzy Setting with an Application to an Energy Planning Problem
In recent two decades, countries focused on minimum extraction of fossil fuels and utilized the renewable energies based on countries' policies and the environmental considerations. Thus, choosing the best renewable energy alternative is a significant role to investment on them. Among the classical decision approaches that have used in the literature, the hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) theory is ap...
متن کاملModelling Group Decision Simulation through Argumentation
Group decision making plays an important role in today’s organisations. The impact of decision making is so high and complex, that rarely the decision making process is made individually. In Group Decision Argumentation, there is a set of participants, with different profiles and expertise levels, that exchange ideas or engage in a process of argumentation and counter-argumentation, negotiate, ...
متن کاملA combination of semantic and attribute-based access control model for virtual organizations
A Virtual Organization (VO) consists of some real organizations with common interests, which aims to provide inter organizational associations to reach some common goals by sharing their resources with each other. Providing security mechanisms, and especially a suitable access control mechanism, which enforces the defined security policy is a necessary requirement in VOs. Since VO is a complex ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013