The Composition and Evolution of a Geophysically Reasonable Moon Produced by a Giant Impact
نویسنده
چکیده
Introduction: The magma ocean model for the early Moon’s evolution has been one of the most important and influential hypotheses to come out of the Apollo program. Recognizing that the earliest stages of a terrestrial planet’s evolution involve widespread melting, and attempting to understand what such a planetary-scale melting episode implies for geophysical and geochemical evolution, has been fundamental in our understanding not only of the Moon but of the major terrestrial planets and the HED parent body. In the 1970s Cameron first suggested that the Moon formed as the result of a Mars-sized planesimal impacting onto the Earth. Since the 1980s this model has gained significant favor. It is consistent with our understanding of how planetesimals form, and we now know that a large number of such giant impacts did occur elsewhere in the solar system. It can explain the depletion of iron metal in the Moon, and might explain the identical oxygen isotope abundances between Earth and Moon rocks. It can explain the Moon’s nearly circular but mildly inclined orbit. And, frankly, no other viable theory for the origin of the Moon exists. However, as modeled by Cameron and by Canup et al. [1], the nature of the impact event has profound implications for both the physical origin of any magma ocean, and for the Moon’s bulk composition.
منابع مشابه
An Alternative Hypothesis for the Formation of the Moon
Introduction: The giant impact hypothesis [1,2] is the cornerstone of current lunar formation research. However, recent analyses of the elemental and isotopic composition of lunar samples show degrees of similarity between Moon and Bulk Silicate Earth (BSE) that are inconsistent with hydrodynamic models of the Moon-forming giant impact showing 60-90% of the Moon is made up of impactor rather th...
متن کاملHf-W AND THE ISOTOPIC CRISIS FOR THE GIANT IMPACT ORIGIN OF THE MOON
Introduction: It has become clear over the last few years that the widely accepted model for the origin of the Earth-Moon system as the result of a Mars-sized giant impactor colliding with proto-Earth is inconsistent with a variety of new isotopic data. Generally, it is thought that the Earth and the Mars-sized Moonforming impactor were isotopically different (for mass independent isotopic vari...
متن کاملTheian Orbital Evolution Amidst the Planetary Leftovers
The formation of the Earth's Moon commonly involves a theory where Theia, a Mars-sized object [1,2], encounters the proto-Earth via a Giant Impact. Updated measurements based on lunar samples indicate an age of the Moon to be roughly 70-110 Myr [3,4] younger than the Calcium Aluminum Inclusions in the chondritic meteorites. This implies that Theia likely existed for 20-80 Myr as one of five sur...
متن کاملA young Moon-forming giant impact at 70-110 million years accompanied by late-stage mixing, core formation and degassing of the Earth.
New W isotope data for lunar metals demonstrate that the Moon formed late in isotopic equilibrium with the bulk silicate Earth (BSE). On this basis, lunar Sr isotope data are used to define the former composition of the Earth and hence the Rb-Sr age of the Moon, which is 4.48+/-0.02Ga, or 70-110Ma (million years) after the start of the Solar System. This age is significantly later than had been...
متن کاملMaking the Moon from a fast-spinning Earth: a giant impact followed by resonant despinning.
A common origin for the Moon and Earth is required by their identical isotopic composition. However, simulations of the current giant impact hypothesis for Moon formation find that most lunar material originated from the impactor, which should have had a different isotopic signature. Previous Moon-formation studies assumed that the angular momentum after the impact was similar to that of the pr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003