CpG island methylator phenotype-positive tumors in the absence of MLH1 methylation constitute a distinct subset of duodenal adenocarcinomas and are associated with poor prognosis.

PURPOSE Little information is available on genetic and epigenetic changes in duodenal adenocarcinomas. The purpose was to identify possible subsets of duodenal adenocarcinomas based on microsatellite instability (MSI), DNA methylation, mutations in the KRAS and BRAF genes, clinicopathologic features, and prognosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival were available for 99 duodenal adenocarcinoma patients. Testing for KRAS and BRAF mutations, MSI, MLH1 methylation, and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status was conducted. A Cox proportional hazard model was built to predict survival. RESULTS CIMP(+) was detected in 27 of 99 (27.3%) duodenal adenocarcinomas and was associated with MSI (P = 0.011) and MLH1 methylation (P < 0.001), but not with KRAS mutations (P = 0.114), as compared with CIMP(-) tumors. No BRAF V600E mutation was detected. Among the CIMP(+) tumors, 15 (55.6%) were CIMP(+)/MLH1-unmethylated (MLH1-U). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that tumors classified by CIMP, CIMP/MLH1 methylation status, or CIMP/MSI status could predict overall survival (OS; P = 0.047, 0.002, and 0.002, respectively), whereas CIMP/MLH1 methylation status could also predict time-to-recurrence (TTR; P = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, CIMP/MLH1 methylation status showed a significant prognostic value in both OS (P < 0.001) and TTR (P = 0.023). Patients with CIMP(+)/MLH1-U tumors had the worst OS and TTR. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed existence of CIMP in duodenal adenocarcinomas. The combination of CIMP(+)/MLH1-U seems to be independently associated with poor prognosis in patients with duodenal adenocarcinomas. This study also suggests that BRAF mutations are not involved in duodenal tumorigenesis, MSI, or CIMP development.