Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviewsmight be posted on theweb : randomised controlled trial
نویسنده
چکیده
Objectives To seewhether telling peer reviewers that their signed reviews of original research papers might be posted on the BMJ’s website would affect the quality of
منابع مشابه
Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVES To see whether telling peer reviewers that their signed reviews of original research papers might be posted on the BMJ's website would affect the quality of their reviews. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING A large international general medical journal based in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS 541 authors, 471 peer reviewers, and 12 editors. INTERVENTION Consecutive ...
متن کاملPrepublication histories and open peer review at the BMJ.
Over the past 15 years peer reviewers for The BMJ have shown, by signing their reviews and declaring to authors and editors any relevant competing interests, that they are unafraid of transparent scientific discourse. Now we are opening up our process to make our reviewers’ role as authors’ critical friends visible to all. From this autumn on thebmj.com all research articles, and certain schola...
متن کاملPeer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملEffect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.
OBJECTIVES To examine the effect on peer review of asking reviewers to have their identity revealed to the authors of the paper. DESIGN Randomised trial. Consecutive eligible papers were sent to two reviewers who were randomised to have their identity revealed to the authors or to remain anonymous. Editors and authors were blind to the intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The quality of the ...
متن کاملEffects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of training on the quality of peer review. DESIGN Single blind randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups receiving different types of training plus a control group. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Reviewers at a general medical journal. Interventions Attendance at a training workshop or reception of a self taught training package focusing on what e...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010