A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping).

نویسندگان

  • Josje H E Arts
  • Mackenzie Hadi
  • Muhammad-Adeel Irfan
  • Athena M Keene
  • Reinhard Kreiling
  • Delina Lyon
  • Monika Maier
  • Karin Michel
  • Thomas Petry
  • Ursula G Sauer
  • David Warheit
  • Karin Wiench
  • Wendel Wohlleben
  • Robert Landsiedel
چکیده

The European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) 'Nano Task Force' proposes a Decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) that consists of 3 tiers to assign nanomaterials to 4 main groups, to perform sub-grouping within the main groups and to determine and refine specific information needs. The DF4nanoGrouping covers all relevant aspects of a nanomaterial's life cycle and biological pathways, i.e. intrinsic material and system-dependent properties, biopersistence, uptake and biodistribution, cellular and apical toxic effects. Use (including manufacture), release and route of exposure are applied as 'qualifiers' within the DF4nanoGrouping to determine if, e.g. nanomaterials cannot be released from a product matrix, which may justify the waiving of testing. The four main groups encompass (1) soluble nanomaterials, (2) biopersistent high aspect ratio nanomaterials, (3) passive nanomaterials, and (4) active nanomaterials. The DF4nanoGrouping aims to group nanomaterials by their specific mode-of-action that results in an apical toxic effect. This is eventually directed by a nanomaterial's intrinsic properties. However, since the exact correlation of intrinsic material properties and apical toxic effect is not yet established, the DF4nanoGrouping uses the 'functionality' of nanomaterials for grouping rather than relying on intrinsic material properties alone. Such functionalities include system-dependent material properties (such as dissolution rate in biologically relevant media), bio-physical interactions, in vitro effects and release and exposure. The DF4nanoGrouping is a hazard and risk assessment tool that applies modern toxicology and contributes to the sustainable development of nanotechnological products. It ensures that no studies are performed that do not provide crucial data and therefore saves animals and resources.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Safety assessment of nanomaterials using an advanced decision-making framework, the DF4nanoGrouping

As presented at the 2016 TechConnect World Innovation Conference on 22-25 May 2016 in Washington DC, USA, the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) 'Nano Task Force' proposes a Decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) consisting of three tiers to assign nanomaterials to four main groups with possible further subgr...

متن کامل

CCollaborative Framework for Decision Making Process of the Water Management (Case Study: Kashafrood Basin)

Sophisticated social- ecology systems, such as those in water management in a basin, are usually dynamic, multidimensional, or multidimensional, requiring serious engagement by multiple actors, and decision making in such systems is always faced with serious problems Kashafrood basin in Khorasan Razavi province is one of the most critical aquifers in the country due to the high population growt...

متن کامل

A Relational Framework to Explain the Town’s Local Actors Decision-Making Mechanism

The life of Towns has become more important and greatly emphasized in recent years and this heralds the arrival of a new era when this type of settlements is introduced as major living and investment capacities. Therefore, it is necessary to study the different aspects of towns in order to plan and manage their development and answer the question about different decision-making mechanism in the...

متن کامل

Fuzzy decision making in testing hypotheses: An introduction to the packages ``FPV" and ``Fuzzy.p.value" with practical examples

This paper reviews and compares two R packages ``FPV" and ``Fuzzy.p.value".These packages are designed for testing hypotheses in a fuzzy environment using a fuzzy $p$-value based approach.In fact, the packages ``FPV" and ``Fuzzy.p.value" propose some useful functions for testing hypotheses when the data / hypotheses are fuzzy rather than crisp.The proposed methods and function...

متن کامل

Fuzzy Multi-criteria decision making approach for human capital evaluation of municipal districts

People in every organization could be considered as the most important resource which contributes to the development of that organization. In fact, human capital is the most important dimension of organization’s intellectual capital especially in service-oriented organizations like municipality. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to introduce a suitable framework for human capital eva...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP

دوره 71 2 Suppl  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015