Comparison of Three Calculation Methods for a Bayesian Inference of P(ϕ1 > ϕ2)

نویسندگان

  • Yohei Kawasaki
  • Asanao Shimokawa
  • Etsuo Miyaoka
چکیده

In Bayesian inference, some researchers have examined the difference of binominal proportions using () 1 2 0 1 2 P | , X X θ π π = > − ∆ , where i X denote binomial random variable with parameter i π. An approximate method and the MCMC method are compared with an exact method for θ , and results of actual clinical trials using θ are presented.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Fermat, Schubert, Einstein, and Behrens-Fisher: The Probable Difference Between Two Means When Ï...12⛀ Ï...22

The history of the Behrens-Fisher problem and some approximate solutions are reviewed. In outlining relevant statistical hypotheses on the probable difference between two means, the importance of the Behrens-Fisher problem from a theoretical perspective is acknowledged, but it is concluded that this problem is irrelevant for applied research in psychology, education, and related disciplines. Th...

متن کامل

Comparison of Three Calculation Methods for a Bayesian Inference of P(π1 > π2)

In Bayesian inference, some researchers have examined the difference of binominal proportions using () 1 2 0 1 2 P | , X X θ π π = > − ∆ , where i X denote binomial random variable with parameter i π. An approximate method and the MCMC method are compared with an exact method for θ , and results of actual clinical trials using θ are presented.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014