Mixed-Initiative Argumentation: A Framework for Justification Management in Clinical Group Decision Support
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper identifies ways in which traditional approaches to argumentation can be modified to meet the needs of practical group decision support. A framework for outcome-driven decision rationale management is proposed that permits a novel conception of mixed-initiative argumentation. The framework is evaluated in the context of group decision support in medicine.
منابع مشابه
Mixed-Initiative Argumentation: Group Decision Support in Medicine
This paper identifies ways in which traditional approaches to argumentation can be modified to meet the needs of practical group decision support. Three specific modifications are proposed. Firstly, a framework for accrual-based argumentation is presented. Second, a framework for outcome-driven decision rationale management is proposed that permits a novel conception of mixed-initiative argumen...
متن کاملArgumentation Theory for Decision Support in Health-Care: A Comparison with Machine Learning
This study investigates role of defeasible reasoning and argumentation theory for decision-support in the health-care sector. The main objective is to support clinicians with a tool for taking plausible and rational medical decisions that can be better justified and explained. The basic principles of argumentation theory are described and demonstrated in a well known health scenario: the breast...
متن کاملA Semantic Enhanced Framework for Argumentation Based Group Decision Support
By an effective Group Decision Support System (GDSS) group members can be supported to identify the problem, form possible actions, resolve the conflict and achieve the joint goals. Throughout such a group decision making process, argumentation is widely regarded as a good means to propose the ideas, justify possible alternatives and convince others to achieve group consensus. In this paper, ar...
متن کاملDecision Making with Assumption-Based Argumentation
In this paper, we present two different formal frameworks for representing decision making. In both frameworks, decisions have multiple attributes and meet different goals. In the second framework, decisions take into account preferences over goals. We also study a family of decision functions representing making decisions with different criteria, including decisions meeting all goals, most goa...
متن کاملArgumentation and multi-agent decision making
This paper summarises our on going work on mixed initiative decision making which extends both classical decision theory and a symbolic theory of decision mak ing based on argumentation to a multi agent domain
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009