Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND To counsel patients adequately, it is important to understand the variables influencing satisfaction and regret following prostatectomy. OBJECTIVE To identify independent predictors for satisfaction and regret after radical prostatectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients who had undergone retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) between 2000 and 2007 were mailed cross-sectional surveys composed of sociodemographic information, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and questions regarding satisfaction and regret. MEASUREMENTS Sociodemographic variables, perioperative complications, type of procedure, length of follow-up, and EPIC scores were evaluated as independent predictors of satisfaction and regret in multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 400 patients responded (response rate 61%) of whom 84% were satisfied and 19% regretted their treatment choice. In multivariate analysis, lower income (odds ratio [OR], 0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.23), shorter follow-up (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), having undergone RRP versus RALP (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.90-10.4)], urinary domain scores (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.60-4.54), and hormonal domain scores (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.30-3.12) were independently associated with satisfaction (p< or =0.039). In terms of regret, RALP versus RRP (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.50-6.07), lower urinary domain scores (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.91) and hormonal domain scores (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98), and years since surgery (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.13-2.36) were again predictive (p< or =0.041). African American race (OR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.52-8.43) and lower bowel domain scores (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.97) were also independently associated with regret (p< or =0.028). CONCLUSIONS Sociodemographic variables and quality of life were important variables associated with satisfaction and regret. Patients who underwent RALP were more likely to be regretful and dissatisfied, possibly because of higher expectation of an "innovative" procedure. We suggest that urologists carefully portray the risks and benefits of new technologies during preoperative counseling to minimize regret and maximize satisfaction.
منابع مشابه
Re: Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Versus Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Early Outcomes from a Randomised Controlled Phase 3 Study.
BACKGROUND The absence of trial data comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy is a crucial knowledge gap in uro-oncology. We aimed to compare these two approaches in terms of functional and oncological outcomes and report the early postoperative outcomes at 12 weeks. METHOD In this randomised controlled phase 3 study, men who had newly diag...
متن کاملIs there any evidence of superiority between retropubic, laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
PURPOSE To compare the perioperative, short-term and long-term postoperative results of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in the most recent studies evaluable. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using PubMed we have undertaken a search based on references from major and recent articles with considerable s...
متن کاملA comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
PURPOSE Surgical technique, patient characteristics and method of pathological review may influence surgical margin status. We evaluated the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in 200 sequential robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and 200 sequential open radical retropubic prostatectomy cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS From July 2002 until December 2006 a total of ...
متن کاملRobotic prostatectomy improves outcomes--after the potentially risky adoption phase.
I am glad to comment on position papers by Dr. Moul and by Drs. Patel and Sivaraman concerning the current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP). It is interesting that two well-informed prostate cancer surgeons have such different perspectives on the relative merits—or lack of merit—of RALP. There is some validity to ...
متن کاملChanges in penile length after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radical prostatectomy is commonly performed for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. Several studies have demonstrated a reduction in penile size after open radical retropubic prostatectomy. The objective of this study is to describe changes in penile length after after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS We perform...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- European urology
دوره 54 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008