What Laboratory Research has Told Us about Dolphin Cognition
نویسندگان
چکیده
My heartfelt thanks to the various agencies, institutions and individuals that have supported this work throughout the years. Special thanks to Peter Ranney and LeBurta Atherton for their generous support, and to the many members of the Dolphin Institute. I am grateful to the National Science Foundation who supported this research at various times over many years, including an initial grant at the inception of the research that allowed me to move beyond some early pilot studies and to develop a place where dolphin cognitive and sensory study could continue. I also thank the Office of Naval Research for their support of our cognitive research, especially during the 1980s. Earthwatch provided annual support through their volunteer program from 1982 to 2000. The Dolphin Institute also provided support during the latter half of the 1990s and the turn of the millennium. There are many co-researchers who worked with me and helped produce the work reviewed here. I would like to give special thanks to several in particular who contributed much to the dolphin research, to the laboratory, and to the dolphins. These include, in rough order of their appearance at the lab: Frank Beach III, William Arbeit Jr. (deceased), Michael Yunker (deceased), Roger Thompson, Carolyn Madsen, Ron Antinoja, Paul Forestell, Jim Wolz, Douglas Richards, Joseph Mobley, Gordon Bauer, Adam Pack, John Gory, Susan Reeve, Mark Xitco, Jim Ralston, Matthias Hoffman-Kuhnt, Stacy Braslau-Schneck, Robert Uyeyama, Deirdre Killebrew, Dave Matus, Mark Deakos, Kristin Taylor, Amy Cutting, Eduardo Mercado III, Rebecca Cowan, and Amy Miller.Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Louis M. Herman, The University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Psychology, 1960 East-West Road, Biomed T311, Honolulu, HI, 96822, U.S.A. ([email protected]). What Laboratory Research has Told Us about Dolphin Cognition
منابع مشابه
Branch support
The dolphin mystique. Throughout the ages, an enduring mystique has developed around dolphins. Even today some people continue to impute dolphins with mystical abilities such as extra-sensory perception and, in alternative medicine circles, special healing powers. An entire industry in ‘dolphinassisted therapy’ has been founded on the idea that dolphins have the capacity to heal illnesses throu...
متن کاملWhat has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)?
cognition is by cognitive neuroimaging – by recording neural activity in a person’s brain while the recorded person is carrying out some cognitive activity. There are numerous different reasons for doing this kind of work. I will consider only one of these reasons, namely, to try to learn more about cognition itself. All other motivations for doing cognitive neuroimaging (e.g., to seek to local...
متن کاملUsing functional neuroimaging to test theories of cognition: a selective survey of studies from 2007 to 2011 as a contribution to the Decade of the Mind Initiative.
Most current studies in the field of cognitive neuroscience are based on the recording of neuroimages from a participant’s brain while that participant is engaged in carrying out some mental activity. The idea is that, by recording the brain activity that accompanies mental processes, we learn where in the brain those mental processes take place. But also it is hoped that such work will shed li...
متن کاملTeacher Cognition and Personal Beliefs: A Harmonious Mismatch?
Some engravings are meant to be adored and some possibly abhorred. Teacher cognition, as a meant-to-be-praised engraving, is defined by Borg (2003, p. 81) as “the unobservable cognitive dimension of teaching what teachers know, believe, and think.” This concept in teaching has recently gained momentum meaning that teachers learn so much about their teaching through the vast experience they have...
متن کاملChapter 14 Is there anything special about working memory ?
In a recent article entitled ‘What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)?’ Coltheart ( 2006 ) concludes that the answer to this question is: ‘nothing’. The essential reason for this gloomy assessment about the value of functional neuroimaging for cognitive psychology boils down to this essential argument, namely, that since psychological theories do not make predictions ab...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010