Why Things Go Wrong: A Formal Theory of Causal Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents a theory of generalized temporal reasoning. We focus on the related problems of 1. Temporal Projection-determining all the facts true in a chronicle, given a partial description of that chronicle, and 2. Explanation-figuring out what went wrong if an unexpected outcome occurs. We present a non-monotonic temporal logic based on the notion that actions only happen if they are motivated. We demonstrate that this theory handles generalized temporal projection correctly, and in particular, solves the Yale Shooting Problem and a related class of problems. We then show how our model lends itself to a very natural characterization of the concept of an adequate explanation for an unexpected outcome.
منابع مشابه
The Rise of Patient Safety-II: Should We Give Up Hope on Safety-I and Extracting Value From Patient Safety Incidents?; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
Who could disagree with the seemingly common-sense reasoning that: “We must learn from the things that go wrong.”? Despite major investments to improve patient safety, relatively few evaluations demonstrate convincing reductions in risk, harm, serious error or death. This disappointing trajectory of improvement from learning from errors or Safety-I as it is sometimes known has led some research...
متن کاملThe Symbiosis of Human and Semantic Technology Through the Lens of Actor-Network Theory
Background: Semantic technologies (STs) have made machine reasoning possible by providing intelligent data management methods. This capability has created new forms of interaction between humans and STs, which is called "semantic interaction." The increasing spread of this form of interaction in daily life reveals the need to identify the factors affecting it and introduce the requirements of...
متن کاملDid Something Go Wrong?
The premise of this symposium seems to be that something went wrong with AI. Otherwise things would be better. What would be better isn't stated. From my point of view what would have been decisively better is to have achieved human-level AI. However, I suspect some people of being disappointed that the AI companies didn't make enough money. Here are some considerations. 1. Understanding intell...
متن کاملExtended affine Lie algebras and other generalizations of affine Lie algebras – a survey
Motivation. The theory of affine (Kac-Moody) Lie algebras has been a tremendous success story. Not only has one been able to generalize essentially all of the well-developed theory of finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras and their associated groups to the setting of affine Lie algebras, but these algebras have found many striking applications in other parts of mathematics. It is natural to as...
متن کاملPlace Goes Wrong in Treating Mind-brain Relationship Clarifying why identity theory is neither reasonable nor a mere scientific problem in disguise
پِلِیس بر این باور است که مسائل فلسفی مرتبط با ماهیتِ نسبتِ میان ذهن و مغز، در نهایت بهنفعِ مادیگرایی -خصوصاً نظریه اینهمانیِ نوعی- کنار گذاشته یا منحل خواهند شد. او این مدعا را فرضیهای علمی و مستدل میداند. من در این مقاله نشان خواهم داد که ماجرا بهگونهای نیست که او میپندارد. اگر چه این متن، سراسر، حاوی جزئیات فراوانی در باب موضع پِلِیس است ولی به منظور فراهم آوردن بستری برای نقد، در ابتدا، روی...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1988