Commentary: IARC Monographs Program and public health under siege by corporate interests.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluates causes of cancer with help from independent international experts in an open and transparent manner. Countries, research and regulatory agencies, and other organizations adopt IARC evaluations for communication of human cancer hazards, and for strategies to prevent cancer. Scientists worldwide endorse IARC cancer evaluations and process. Those with economic interests, however, challenge IARC's cancer evaluations, most recently for glyphosate and red and processed meats, and are conducting a campaign including intervention from US Congressional Representatives to discredit IARC's review process and to undermine financial support-a campaign intimidating to IARC and Working Group members. Challenges to scientific interpretations serve to advance science and should be resolved by scientific experts who do not have conflicts of interest. Such interference does not bode well for the free flow of scientific information that informs and protects the public from risks of cancer.
منابع مشابه
Delivered Electronically
The American Chemistry Council commends the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) for soliciting widespread review by the scientific community as a whole on the draft language under consideration for revision of the IARC Preamble to the IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. The IARC Monograph process is widely recognized for its contribution over the la...
متن کاملPresentation of Study Results: The Authors’ Responsibility
Environmental Health Perspectives • volume 120 | number 9 | September 2012 A 343 due to disease misclassification, we (Camargo et al. 2011) concluded that our meta-analysis supports the IARC classification. This illustrates again that meta-analyses are not free from subjective decisions and interpretations. In conclusion, meta-analyses are a quantitative statistical tool that, in some instances...
متن کاملPrioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides
BACKGROUND Identifying cancer hazards is the first step towards cancer prevention. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme, which has evaluated nearly 1,000 agents for their carcinogenic potential since 1971, typically selects agents for hazard identification on the basis of public nominations, expert advice, published data on carcinogenicity, and public heal...
متن کاملThe Science and Practice of Carcinogen Identification and Evaluation
Several national and international health agencies have established programs with the aim of identifying agents and exposures that cause cancer in humans. Carcinogen identification is an activity grounded in the scientific evaluation of the results of human epidemiologic studies, long-term bioassays in experimental animals, and other data relevant to an evaluation of carcinogenicity and its mec...
متن کاملHousehold use of solid fuels and high-temperature frying.
Kalpana Balakrishnan, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, No. 1, Ramachandra Nagar, Porur, Chennai 600116, India Douglas Barnes, Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), Energy and Water Department, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, MSN H4-403, Washington DC 20433, USA (not present for evaluations) James A. Bo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- American journal of industrial medicine
دوره 61 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018