Analogical Reasoning with Typical Examples
نویسندگان
چکیده
Begriie ohne Anschauungen sind leer Anschauungen ohne Begriie blind. Abstract Typical examples, that is, examples that are representative for a particular situation or concept, play an important r^ ole in human knowledge representation and reasoning. In real life situations more often than not, instead of a lengthy abstract characterization , a typical example is used to describe the situation. This well-known observation has been the motivation for various investigations in experimental psychology, which also motivate our formal characterization of typical examples, based on a partial order for their typicality. Reasoning by typical examples is then developed as a special case of analogical reasoning using the semantic information contained in the corresponding concept structures. We derive new inference rules by replacing the explicit information about connections and similarity, which are normally used to formalize analogical inference rules, by information about the relationship to typical examples. Using these inference rules analogical reasoning proceeds by checking a related typical example, this is a form of reasoning based on semantic information from cases.
منابع مشابه
Two Kinds of Non-monotonic Analogical Inference Two Kinds of Non-monotonic Analogical Inference ?
This paper addresses two modi of analogical reasoning. The rst modus is based on the explicit representation of the justiication for the analogical inference. The second modus is based on the representation of typical instances by concept structures. The two kinds of analogical inferences rely on diierent forms of relevance knowledge that cause non-monotonicity. While the uncertainty and non-mo...
متن کاملUsing Exemplary Knowledge forJusti ed Analogical ReasoningManfred Kerber
Begriie ohne Anschauungen sind leer Anschauungen ohne Begriie blind. Abstract Typical instances, that is, instances that are representative for a particular situation or concept, play an important r^ ole in human knowledge representation and reasoning, in particular in analogical reasoning. This well-known observation has been a motivation for investigations in cognitive psychology which provid...
متن کاملTwo Kinds of Non-Monotonic Analogical Inference
This paper addresses two modi of analogical reasoning. The rst modus is based on the explicit representation of the justiication for the analogical inference. The second modus is based on the representation of typical instances by concept structures. The two kinds of analogical inferences rely on diierent forms of relevance knowledge that cause non-monotonicity. While the uncertainty and non-mo...
متن کاملA Reasoning System Using Inductive Inference of Analogical Union
Analogical reasoning derives a new fact based on the analogous facts previously known. Inductive inference is a process of gaining a general rule from examples. We propose a new reasoning system using inductive inference and analogical reasoning, which is applicable to intellectual information processing and we characterize its power. Given an enumeration of paired examples, this system inducti...
متن کاملApplying analogical reasoning to introductory-level synthesis problems
This study compared the effect of two types of interventions on subsequent student performance with a target synthesis problem. Students either solved two single-concept problems (priming) or compared worked solutions across one of four different analogical reasoning conditions. These four conditions varied according to the type of examples compared (single-concept vs. synthesis) and structural...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1992