Noncooperative Coalitional Bargaining with Generalized Selection of Proposers∗
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents a noncooperative coalitional bargaining model with generalized selection of proposers, which includes Chatterjee et al.’s (1993) fixed-order-proposer model and Okada’s (1996) random-proposer model as two extreme special cases. In the model, at each round, proposers are selected according to recognition probabilities, which depend on who rejects a proposal at the previous round. This paper provides conditions for the subgame efficiency, which means that the grand coalition is formed and no delay occurs in every subgame, both with each discount factor δ < 1 and in the limit δ → 1. It is shown that for any discount factor δ < 1, the subgame efficiency is more difficultly achieved as each player is selected as a proposer with a higher probability after she rejects a proposal at the previous round, and in the limit δ → 1, the probability does not matter for the subgame efficiency.
منابع مشابه
Noncooperative Coalitional Bargaining with Partition-Based Selection of Proposers∗
This paper presents a noncooperative dynamic n-player coalitional bargaining game with transferable utilities, which includes Chatterjee et al.’s (1993) fixed-order-proposer model and Okada’s (1996) random-proposer model as two extreme special cases. In this model, proposers are selected by protocols based on partitions of player sets. This paper provides conditions for the subgame efficiency, ...
متن کاملCoalitional Bargaining with Markovian Proposers
The paper generalizes coalitional bargaining of the Baron-Ferejohn type (Eraslan and McLennan, 2006) to non-independent proposers. Widening the scope of possible proposer dynamics significantly, this allows for likely continued offers, alternating offers (Calvó-Armengol, 2001b), and deterministic dynamics such as clockwise rotation of proposers (Herrero, 1985). Existence of stationary subgame p...
متن کاملCoalitional bargaining games with random proposers: Theory and application
We consider a non-cooperative coalitional bargaining game with random proposers to bridge a gap between non-cooperative game theory and cooperative game theory. Theoretical results include the existence of a stationary subgame perfect equilibrium (SSPE) and the characterization of the grand-coalition SSPE as a generalized Nash bargaining solution, provided that it lies in the core. We also prov...
متن کاملUniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining
We study a model of sequential bargaining in which, in each period before an agreement is reached, a proposer is randomly selected, the proposer suggests a division of a pie of size one, each other agent either approves or rejects the proposal, and the proposal is implemented if the set of approving agents is a winning coalition for the proposer. We show that stationary equilibrium outcomes of ...
متن کاملSelf-Serving Use of Equity Rules in Bargaining with Asymmetric Outside Options
Self-Serving Use of Equity Rules in Bargaining with Asymmetric Outside Options We experimentally investigate multiple notions of equity in ultimatum bargaining with asymmetric outside options. Building on the generalized equity principle formulated by Selten (1978), we derive three different equity rules that can explain 43% of all offers. Our withinsubject design further allows us to show that...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006