On the Dissociation of Word/Nonword Repetition Effects in Lexical Decision: An Evidence Accumulation Account
نویسندگان
چکیده
A number of models of visual-word recognition assume that the repetition of an item in a lexical decision experiment increases that item's familiarity/wordness. This would produce not only a facilitative repetition effect for words, but also an inhibitory effect for nonwords (i.e., more familiarity/wordness makes the negative decision slower). We conducted a two-block lexical decision experiment to examine word/nonword repetition effects in the framework of a leading "familiarity/wordness" model of the lexical decision task, namely, the diffusion model (Ratcliff et al., 2004). Results showed that while repeated words were responded to faster than the unrepeated words, repeated nonwords were responded to more slowly than the nonrepeated nonwords. Fits from the diffusion model revealed that the repetition effect for words/nonwords was mainly due to differences in the familiarity/wordness (drift rate) parameter. This word/nonword dissociation favors those accounts that posit that the previous presentation of an item increases its degree of familiarity/wordness.
منابع مشابه
A Model for Evidence Accumulation 1 Running head: A Model for Evidence Accumulation A Model for Evidence Accumulation in the Lexical Decision Task
We present a new model for lexical decision, REM-LD, that is based on REM theory (e.g., Shiffrin & Steyvers, 1997). REM-LD uses a principled (i.e., Bayes rule) decision process that simultaneously considers the diagnosticity of the evidence for the WORD response and the NONWORD response. The model calculates the odds ratio that the presented stimulus is a word or a nonword by accumulating ...
متن کاملPsychonomic Bulletin and Review, in press Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: A test of the Evidence Accumulation and Deadline accounts
The pattern of masked repetition priming effects for word and nonword targets differs across tasks: masked priming effects in lexical decision occur for positive responses (i.e., words) but not for negative responses (nonwords), whereas masked priming effects in the cross-case same-different task occur for positive responses (“same”), but not for negative responses (“different”) –regardless of ...
متن کاملA model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
We present a new model for lexical decision, REM-LD, that is based on REM theory (e.g., ). REM-LD uses a principled (i.e., Bayes' rule) decision process that simultaneously considers the diagnosticity of the evidence for the 'WORD' response and the 'NONWORD' response. The model calculates the odds ratio that the presented stimulus is a word or a nonword by averaging likelihood ratios for lexica...
متن کاملMasked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: a test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts.
The pattern of masked repetition priming effects for word and nonword targets differs across tasks: Masked-priming effects in lexical decision occur for positive responses (i.e., words), but not for negative responses (nonwords), whereas masked-priming effects in the cross-case same-different task occur for positive responses (same), but not for negative responses (different)--regardless of lex...
متن کاملA transfer analysis of the repetition effect in the lexical and ambiguity decision tasks.
Two experiments were performed in an attempt to evaluate explanations of repetition priming-the facilitation observed when the same word is processed a second time in the same task. One task employed was lexical decision (word/nonword) and the other was ambiguity decision (ambiguous/ unambiguous). In the first experiment, transfer on a lexical decision task was measured following either a lexic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Frontiers in psychology
دوره 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016