Management of Attainable Tradeoffs between Conflicting Goals

نویسنده

  • Marek Makowski
چکیده

Rational decision-making requires governance of attainable trade-offs between conflicting goals, uncertainties and risks, which in turn demands both novel modeling methods and appropriate modeling technology. The paper deals with recent developments in applied modeling that have been motivated by the requirements for model-based support of solving complex problems. It starts with presenting novel modeling technology and integrated methods of integrated model analysis aimed at supporting decisionmakers in diversified ways of analysis of the underlying decision problem. Then, multicriteria analysis is discussed in more detail with a focus on an extension of the reference point optimization, which supports an effective analysis of trade-offs between conflicting criteria aiming at analysis of attainable goals. Next, new approaches to coping with endogenous uncertainty and catastrophic risks are characterized, followed by a summary of issues related to transparency and public understanding.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Simulation-based Assessment of Performance-Workload Tradeoffs for System Design Evaluation

Ideally, when selecting a system design or re-design, the selected option should balance workload and performance. However, previous research suggests that the relationship between workload and performance is nonlinear, thus achieving one, does not imply achieving the other. To ensure that a system will meet performance and workload goals, system designers should investigate the expected worklo...

متن کامل

Lexicographic ordering: intuitive multicriteria optimization for IMRT.

Optimization problems in IMRT inverse planning are inherently multicriterial since they involve multiple planning goals for targets and their neighbouring critical tissue structures. Clinical decisions are generally required, based on tradeoffs among these goals. Since the tradeoffs cannot be quantitatively determined prior to optimization, the decision-making process is usually indirect and it...

متن کامل

Optimization of Partly Conflicting Goals in Complex Resource Planning

Many optimization models are limited with respect to the management of inconsistency between the optimization goals. As consequence, these models in many cases achieve results that are optimal for the model but not for the problem. In real world problems the optimization goals are usually partly conflicting. Independence of goals as precondition usually does not hold and utility functions based...

متن کامل

Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.

Women are underrepresented in most high-level positions in organizations. Though a great deal of research has provided evidence that bias and discrimination give rise to and perpetuate this gender disparity, in the current research we explore another explanation: men and women view professional advancement differently, and their views affect their decisions to climb the corporate ladder (or not...

متن کامل

Finding Efficient Harvest Schedules under Three Conflicting Objectives

Public forests have many conflicting uses. Designing forest management schemes that provide the public with an optimal bundle of benefits is therefore a major challenge. Although a capability to quantify and visualize the tradeoffs between the competing objectives can be very useful for decisionmakers, developing this capability presents unique difficulties if three or more conflicting objectiv...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • JCP

دوره 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009