REVIEWS
چکیده
چکیدهای برای این سند ثبت نشده است.
چکیدهای برای این سند ثبت نشده است.
In their critique of the peer-review process, Trafimow and Rice (2009, this issue) dramatize a number of ways in which the review process can go awry. On the whole, I agree that the issues highlighted by the authors are indeed problems worthy of careful consideration. However, I
Traditional literature reviews (TLR) are found in all disciplines including religion. In TLR a research question is chosen, resources are identified that have information relevant to the question, and one uses information from the resources to address the TLR question. Such revie
reputation systems have been recognized as successful online review communities and word-of-mouth channels. Our study draws upon the elaboration likelihood model to analyze the extent that the characteristics of reviewers and their early reviews reduce or worsen the bias of subse
Clinicians are faced with the challenge of keeping abreast of the rapidly growing clinical literature. One method that can help clinicians meet this challenge is the provision of synthesised evidence by such groups as the Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Library contains the
Virtually every previous review has concluded that structuring the selection interview improves its psychometric properties. This paper reviews the research literature in order to describe and evaluate the many ways interviews can be structured. Based on nearly 200 articles and b
This research challenges the presumption that reading online reviews solely affect reader attitudes toward a prospective decision. Instead, readers may strategically select and read reviews after a decision. This research advances and tests hypotheses proposing that: (1) post-dec